Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Hitomi

Junior Member
Registered Member
IAF needs a stopgap, according to Indian analysts.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Might as well try to ask Saab to fix the LCA design like that time H&K fixed the L85 for the Brits and try to absorb the lessons like the Chinese did with the Z-10 and Kamov.

Buying Gripen would definitely zombify the LCA mkII upgrade program for even longer than it already is.

Frankly I am happy that the Indians rather not put in the hard work at all.
 

Broccoli

Senior Member
Gripen E is the best choice right now. But in 3 years the Su-75 Checkmate will likely be available. It uses the same systems as the Su-57. They only need to test the airframe.

India already had bad experience with Su-57 and wasted money on it without getting anything in return. Doubt they do that mistake again.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
India already had bad experience with Su-57 and wasted money on it without getting anything in return. Doubt they do that mistake again.
India need to stick with their fighter programs and build on them even if they are not good presently. Would be better to mass produce the LCA mkII , fill the gap and build on the experience. Right now stepping back of it is putting most in the bin...
 

Fulcrum007

New Member
Registered Member
"Home-made artillery system". Is this artillery made with the tooling India's Bharat Forge got from Noricum in Austria based on Gerald Bull's artillery pieces?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I suppose that would be the Bharat 52 which is Bharat Forge's 52 cal version of the their own design which is heavily borrowed from GHN 45 artillery gun from Norincum (Austria), whose design as well as the entire factory from Austria was acquired and reestablished in India. GHN-45 in turn is based on GC-45 design which has a major precursor in artillery designs world wide.

ATAGS on the other hand is a joint venture between ARDE and TASL/BF which is a comparatively larger piece utilising a 25L barrel (others are limited to 23L maximum) with superior chamber pressure and EFC values and a 6-round conveyor/revolver automated autoloader (others come around 3-round) with upto Zone-1 to Zone-7 BMCS capabilities (Zone-6 for others) and superior MRSI characterstics with an all-electric traverse to boot.FilArqSaAAAzJMU.jpg20230403_102747.jpg
 
Last edited:

Fulcrum007

New Member
Registered Member
I'm curious if India ever interested in developing guided artillery munitions in the line of Krasnopol or Excalibur.
Both of the aforementioned are already operational with IA arty corps with the former being locally produced and gradually being replaced by the latter. Krasnopol in particular is used to great effect across the LoC.

As for such guided munitions in the indigenous domain, it's usually a mix of state-run MIC efforts and other private players envisaging on a JV with either the local or foreign entities. For instance, Munition India Limited (MIL) had released an EoI for Development of 155mm Smart Ammunition for all in-service Artillery Guns Systems i.e. 52/45/39 calibre under the Make-1 category. Then there's the 155mm Terminally Guided Munition (TGM) project under Make-2 category which is in advanced phases. Apart from that, there are programs from DRDO on SAL Guidance ,GPS/IRNSS/Inertial Guided Correction fuse/artillery, and MMW Guided Artillery and also an active effort by MIL which is seeking to capitalize on the above and build a fusion of existing tech i.e. IRNSS/GPS Guidance + SAL/MMW Seeker for redundancy in GPS denied environment and better accuracy.

Range extension projects currently include an ambitious ramjet one by IIT-M and a solid rocket assisted by Kalyani. Whether as to if these would actually materialise and be taken for production is murky as always.
 
Top