What's the purpose of that design if not stealth ?Please understand that the TEDBF is in no way "stealth". Compare the geometry of the TEDBF to something like the KF-21. Stealth geometry generally involves radar absorbing composites and coatings, sharp corners to deflect radar signals away from the emitter. (very broad generalizations of stealth)
1. The TEDBF's DSI intakes are rounded and not angled forwards or backwards, but rather it is angled straight which will reflect the radar straight back to the emitter.
2. The TEDBF's forward facing profile has multiple rounded angles which increase RCS
Question, is the TEDBF using the Uttam radar?
Is the TEDBF using a coated glass cockpit?
Look if you are so insistent on that the LCH is stealth. By the same metric the Z-10 would also be "stealth".
You also haven't even refuted to my previous statements.
The main rotor isn't even shrouded to reduce RCS, the main gun isn't shrouded, the fucking landing gears cannot be stored internally, the amount of vents and noise on the surface of the helicopter all degrade the "stealth" aspect of the helicopter significantly. The fact that you somehow believe that the LCH is somehow stealthy in any way shape or form is hilarious. Clearly stealth was not a consideration during the design phase. Does it even use radar absorbing coatings/composites? I think not.
Lets be reasonable and cease with the ridiculous statements that make you look like a peabrain, stealth was in no way shape or form even considered during the design process of the LCH.
You think they designed those aircrafts avoiding sharp angles (compromising aerodynamics) only to make it look cool ?