the whole talk regarding TEDBF with Tarmak007
Certainly, they seem to go with the Close coupled Canard configuration for better maneuverability and take off and landing performance.
Those "cheeks" seem to be Rafalesque. But
RafaleM doesn't have folding wings. Which means that the wing span of this fighter is larger?
So that means this fighter isn't just designed for Vikrant but certainly the much touted, yet in the drawing board, larger Vishal.
I'm guessing this aircraft, as evidence by the interview being yet to receive final go from Naval air forces, might take atleast a decade to see full operational sorties.
I'm guessing the engines are likely to be GE-414 INS6. Idon't think anything better would be offered by US. Still, the most intriguing part is the addition of folding wings.I don't seem to remember any previous example of a Delta wing fighter jet able to fold its wings.
Pretty Bold I'd say but me thinks the choice of larger wings and therefore the necessity for folding wings has got to do with mitigating maximum weight limitations on Ski-launched take off.Does that mean the next Carrier from India wouldn't be a Catobar?