Bose
New Member
I dont know if its is true, but my thoughts on why Su-35 could make sense.can any one make sense of what what the russians are saying.
is he talking about upgrading sukhoi 30 MKI to Su 35s standards or simply buying new Su-35-s or pak fa?????????
Even then I feel MiG-29M/MiG-35 would make much more sense if Rafale deal falls apart.
Su-30MKI is better than Rafale in almost every thing that we want an aircraft to do and it can be updated when needed and as per requirement. But the main drawback that I see is it being a twin seater and hence a major drain on IAF pilots. An AF cant afford to depend on building upon their strength on twin-seaters. So a single seat version of the MKI is needed, but developing a new single-seater Su-30MKI is not logical in an economical sense. That makes us arrive at a point where we need to search for an alternative that is modern and as capable, if not more, than what Su-30MKI is now, but that comes in a single seat version. And probably the only a/c in that size and capablity is the Su-35.
I feel this could be the reason and logic (if at all that report is true) behind looking to Su-35 as an alternative to Rafale.