Hi,
at last after a year they recognised their soldiers loss in the line of duty, by the way before this time or last year what they thinking of their soldiers AWOL or kidnapped by the opponents
thank you
Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.
- Thread starter bd popeye
- Start date
at last after a year they recognised their soldiers loss in the line of duty, by the way before this time or last year what they thinking of their soldiers AWOL or kidnapped by the opponents
thank you
Car accident enroute to Lahore Port.
India's Bhuj Airforce base underground Ammo storage design
Just thought it was interesting
Just thought it was interesting
Hi,
why not to get from more reliable partner like Russia buy some su57 will price tag of engine technology this way Russian will be happy and India will get better option instead of looking towards west
thank you
why not to get from more reliable partner like Russia buy some su57 will price tag of engine technology this way Russian will be happy and India will get better option instead of looking towards west
thank you
If im not mistaken, Russia refused ToT for core engine tech, hence why all Indian programs involved Western engines.
They probably regret it now even with minimal engine ToT
This has gotta be one of the stupidest types of cope shit I've ever come across in this forum.
Really? You think that Rafale's engines are hung underneath wing pylons like normal commercial jetliners (right), where the aircraft can still fly even when the engine detaches from its underwing pylon, as long as the aircraft's wing structural integrity is maintained?
On the other hand, Rafale's engines (left) are entirely enveloped/enclosed by the fuselage (i.e., the main structural body) of the Rafale airframe. If that engine can fall out of the fuselage, that means the forces involved in causing this to happen would've caused the entire aircraft to suffer a catastrophic structural failure of the airframe, such that the whole aircraft would have disintegrated in the first place.
I don't think this requires advanced understanding in the engineering and physics fields to understand and acknowledge.
Last edited:
India had partnered with Russia to develop a two-seater version of the Su-57. Then India pulled out and decided to develop the AMCA. They cited that the Su-57 wasn't good enough for them.
Why should India return to a plane that it had rejected when it now wants to join France to develop the FCAS? The Indians have already pivoted to the France for awhile. Now India is treating Russia like a 2nd tier supplier.
Russia for it's part has been rather generous with sharing technology with India for decades. HAL have assembled Migs for decades. So why hasn't India absorbed the ToT to produce proper fighters and engines today? This is a question for India to answer.