manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Are you joking? You're equating building an incinerator to anti-government riots?? That's like saying these parents let their kids choose any color candy they wanted so they'll probably let them pick their own bedtime and whether or not they need to study as well! Beijing never relents on actual core issues. Even in Wuhan, Beijing still did the leading! It said "We're gonna build an incinerator!" And the people totally opposed it and Beijing considered their opinions, and said, "OK, we can cancel it." The government still provided the leadership, both to launch the initiative and to cancel it. In Hong Kong, Beijing is doing (seemingly) nothing. In your story, that would equate to Beijing waiting for a mass pro-incinerator rally before meekly coming out to say they'll build it.No, you are wrong. The protests actually do happen in mainland China, and the government listens. Nearly all these protests are about local issues; Beijing almost never needs to act. They are handled locally.
For example, just this summer, against the building of an incinerator for burning foreign trash. The local people disagreed with the government, and understandably so: why should they endure polluted air so foreigners can benefit? The protest made the local government cancel the incinerator and promise not to build it without the approval of the people.
Nearly all the protests in the mainland are like that: they are local rallies about local issues. Beijing may actually be quietly encouraging them, as they can counter some corrupt or overbearing officials.
As the Wuhan incident proves, Zhongnanhai is not as inflexible as you apparently think it should be. Usually it leads, but sometimes it follows. Beijing doesn't always have to do what the local people want. But it can, if it chooses to do so. It does not have to be as rigid as you.
A government can be pliable to the requests of its people while still always leading and that is Zhongnanhai. You are confusing those 2.
No no no, that's you moving the goal post now. I just showed you mass rallies with malls filled with people and you said now they need to be larger LOL How large? Get out of here. You didn't even know about these events; you came here arguing without keeping yourself up to date and now you want to change the goal post?Good, thanks. Rather late (just last month), but a good start. The pro-Beijing rallies need to grow much larger before the world will take them seriously.
These aren't late; there were a few before them as well. But there are less and less because Beijing will not support them. They are disappointed; they're good people and good upstanding people who have jobs don't want to mix-up with violent unemployed armed thugs all day long! How hard is that to understand? You asked them to lead, which is an unreasonable request in the first place, they gave it to you, so now you say they didn't lead hard enough? Forget about it! If they have to lead harder than this, they can replace the central government.
Your version of how a government works is total cavemen democracy, or just anarchy. The government doesn't know shit on what to do and always waits for people, not even by voting, but by mass gathering, to express what they want. This is a joke conjured from your imagination. It exists nowhere in the modern world.
It doesn't make sense that the government needs to lead the people??!! This is some dirt bottom basic logic; I can't break this down further than that.No, I understood what you were saying. You simply weren't making much sense.
If I'm not making any sense, then how come my comments got way more likes than yours? If you're driving and suddenly all the other cars are approaching in the oncoming direction, check yourself, don't accuse everyone else of driving the wrong way.
Last edited: