While my Yue Fei reference sparked some meaningful conversation (even by Mr. Brumby who previously only posted one-sided articles in "obnoxious" formatting), I think it has kind of run its course and went off the rails (HK Protest vs Loyalty to Party). Back on topic...
The big problem here is that these Evangelical Churches are an almost perfect mechanism for moving slush money. All they have to say is that it was a donation following a televised revivalist meeting.
No doubt these kids are well equipped, well organised, well motivated and with some on the ground, well versed in civil disobedience etc. Clearly there are controlling minds pulling the strings and providing the resources.
Either no one is investigating these, or perhaps the authorities are using these as counter-intel. One thing is for sure, there are many questionable organizations popping up.
Buried behind many pages ago was my simple analysis of a group called FreedomHKG which was behind full page ads in newspapers around the world including NYT. The alleged source of their money was crowdfunding, but doing some simple tracing of their timelime yielded the reality that it was impossible to move the money for an ad (definitely in excess of $100,000, $200,000 according to the crowdfunding site) without money laundering checks.
See Post
Another group that was originally posted by Gatekeeper "Britons in Hong Kong" seems like a psych op group.
In this case, I have no circumstantial evidence for this group besides my own common sense analysis
1. Consistency in brand/messaging. The font/logo/hashtags are all very consistent. This is a hallmark of strong organization and likely reusing assets. Members of a more decentralized organization would likely add their own personalizations, font changes, additional hashtags, etc.
2. See the attached picture. That is probably a 10 foot vinyl banner. Such a banner costs a few hundred dollars on Vistaprint. It's not a huge sum of money or difficult to coordinate, but again, you can see the banner does not deviate from the web design. It likely means they have access to the original vector files. This is something I attribute more to organizations again. A typical "rookie" mistake is to use raster/bitmap image files (JPEG), when creating printed work, especially a large banner would become pixelated. Now they might have graphic artists in the group that would be aware of this, but it would be making even more assumptions.
3. This compares closely to the "Russian Meddling Campaign", if you have seen some of those examples, you will see similar slickly produced graphics. As many have pointed out, these campaigns are best at sowing domestic discord.
I would suggest members to keep an eye out to see if there are more similar "groups"