Quickie
Colonel
When I was in ml China I noticed the decor/design/arts almost everywhere (esp. high end places) were Western (SG and HK is the same); non-Western more to be found at ancient sites, or low end places (else cheap quality or obviously inauthentic) so people don't psychologically link "Chineseness" with modernity, prosperity etc. The Japanese and Koreans infuse everything with their pre-Westernised culture: in SG many hold these in higher regard. the British propagated their culture and thence influence that way too. whatever your views on "changing culture" or whatever, stereotypes are a powerful psychological tool. The only way to undo the damage is a reversal of the hierarchy of opportunity with all forms of Chinese identity expression at the top.
I'm no expert on the subject of Singapore. What I'm familiar with is that Singapore's government policy has to take into account its multi-ethnicities. As a case in point, the use of an international language such as the English language as the nation's communication language is meant to be fair to all the different races. Mandarin is promoted to bridge the different Chinese dialects.
Imo, when it comes to the destruction of culture and language, the ethnic Chinese in Indonesia had the worst fate. The situation for them has now somewhat improved with the removal of the restriction of the practice of Chinese tradition and beliefs but they seem to have lost their ability to speak in their mother tongue.
Last edited: