Excerpts from four academic papers from 2017:
-《航空弹药旋转弹射装置滚转机构力学特性分析》(Analysis of the Mechanical Characteristics of the Rolling Mechanism in Aircraft Munition Rotary Ejection Devices)
-《轰炸机巡航导弹旋转投弹仿真研究》(Simulation Research on Rotary Bombing of Cruise Missiles by Bombers)
-《两种弹射方案对旋转发射架的振动影响分析》(Analysis of the Vibration Impact of Two Ejection Schemes on Rotary Launchers)
-《巡航导弹旋转弹射装置设计及动力学仿真研究》(Design and Dynamic Simulation Research of a Cruise Missile Rotary Ejection Device)
View attachment 167957 View attachment 167958
View attachment 167959 View attachment 167960
View attachment 167961 View attachment 167962
While narrow, it should be around ~1.9m. It's still a bomber designed for ancient vanilla 1940s nukes.Maybe a stupid question, but this is IMO more likely related to the H-20 or any new type and not for the H-6 with its narrow bomb-bay?! Or am I wrong?
Maybe a stupid question, but this is IMO more likely related to the H-20 or any new type and not for the H-6 with its narrow bomb-bay?! Or am I wrong?
Would be small diameter missiles, if the center of the rotary system is 50cm to fit in H-6, it look like about 20cm diameter max for the missiles. Numbers would still be interesting but range or warhead payload of these would be small.There are sayings that the IWB of the H-6 family is only about 6 to 6.5 meters long, whereas the CJ-20 is about 8 meters long.
In the meantime, I kinda doubt that the GJ-X's IWB will only be about 6.5 meters long, given how it's about 21-24 meters long per satellite imagery. Same for the H-20 (that she is meant to carry large-sized payloads), per some unverified rumors.
Hence, I'd choose to play it safe and assume that this is meant for the H-6.
Would be small diameter missiles, if the center of the rotary system is 50cm to fit in H-6, it look like about 20cm diameter max for the missiles. Numbers would still be interesting but range or warhead payload of these would be small.
A testing bed would still help testing the system to scale it up for new platforms.

我军国产战略轰炸机发射反舰巡航导弹只能外挂不能内埋Technically, this setup could still fit Tomahawk-sized cruise missiles (~0.52 meters in diameter, ~5.6 meters in length) inside the H-6, in case China does have such missiles in active service. Yes, it'd be a tight fit, albeit most likely not undoable.
I'm kind of late on this. What is the improvement from CJ-10 to CJ-20?There are sayings that the IWB of the H-6 family is only about 6 to 6.5 meters long, whereas the CJ-20 is about 8 meters long.
In the meantime, I kinda doubt that the GJ-X's IWB will only be about 6.5 meters long, given how it's about 21-24 meters long per satellite imagery. Same for the H-20 (that she is meant to carry large-sized payloads), per some unverified rumors.
Hence, I'd choose to play it safe and assume that this is meant for the H-6.
我军国产战略轰炸机发射反舰巡航导弹只能外挂不能内埋
YJ-83K length wise will fit, and they're talking about folding main wing.
I'm kind of late on this. What is the improvement from CJ-10 to CJ-20?