H-6 Bomber Aircraft Discussions

escobar

Brigadier
H-6

001fd04c62e810a0236817.jpg

001fd04c62e810a0236818.jpg


---------- Post added at 06:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:15 PM ----------

:confused:

h6hormwithgreenstore.jpg
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Yeah, nah that would be stupid. Why RE Su-34 when they can build a similar plane themselves.

Besides H-6 is being manufactured from the ground up through H-6K so clearly PLAAF intends to keep operating them badgers for a while yet.
 

Speeder

Junior Member
how can they reverse engineer the SU-34 if they don't have one to start with


Yeah, nah that would be stupid. Why RE Su-34 when they can build a similar plane themselves.

Besides H-6 is being manufactured from the ground up through H-6K so clearly PLAAF intends to keep operating them badgers for a while yet - Bltizo

--With experiences of Su-27, J-11B, Su-30 and J-15, to "REing" another "flanker" look-alike would not be as difficult as people might think of even without one Su-34 in hand, I pressume?

...a bit like if one who's been making burgers for Burger King for ages surely could take on that of McD given a notice(granted, it's not as simple as making burgers, but you get the drift), especially with the help of ample wind tunnels, supercomputers, a truck load of $$$ and, above all, SAC's irresistiblely age-long reputation of stalking Flankers as if there were no tomorrow, no?

Don't get me wrong, peronsally I think Su-34 is a far better option for the moment.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
Yeah, nah that would be stupid. Why RE Su-34 when they can build a similar plane themselves.

Besides H-6 is being manufactured from the ground up through H-6K so clearly PLAAF intends to keep operating them badgers for a while yet.

H-6K is totally new bomber, nothing similar to Tu-16, in USSR it would be called TU-97
 
Top