I thought China already has capability to strike US with ICBMs. I didn't get what real capability means.China has no real capability to attack the US
From what i understand, using different platform enhances survival. However we are looking at the MAD scenario in that case.
I get the number theory. But in case of nuclear weapons, it's like saying both you & me are at point blank range. You have got a rifles,bombs, explosives while i only have a magazine.It really needs to stockpile huge numbers of these to remove American hawks even entertaining the idea of preliminary strike. At the moment its ICBM and warhead numbers may be a little precarious.
Let us consider that that US nuclear warhead number isn't 5000, it's 50000. Do you think the "hawks" in their mind really want to test out who survives what?
Did you ever think that, publicly letting these "ideas" out is more of publicity stunt than reality?
5 h-bomb is enough to send US to stone age targeting their financial hubs. 300 is way over kill for cold war legacy era arsenal.
They also entertained the idea against USSR.