Well that's one fund I don't mind seeing scammedThis and the salary thieves working for the MSM scam the USG for its 300 million anti-China propaganda fund. We have seen too many journos recycling and reusing each other's anti-China stories.
Well that's one fund I don't mind seeing scammedThis and the salary thieves working for the MSM scam the USG for its 300 million anti-China propaganda fund. We have seen too many journos recycling and reusing each other's anti-China stories.
The graph did a great job fooling me on the first look. I thought "Oh at least they managed to cut the derailments by more than half." Then I realized that the baseline is 900 not zero!The USA should first solve the tiny problem of 3 train derailments a day. After decades of neglect and making everything a legal blackhole they have many low hanging apples to collect in infrastructure.
View attachment 117398.
True but thieves should still be called out even if they steal from a thief, in particular when these thieves claim having the moral high ground.Well that's one fund I don't mind seeing scammed
Veterinarians collapsing after a 32 hour surgery to save an indian monitor lizard after [redacted]
Very debatable how superior IAF was vs PLAAF in 1980's.If it was a LLM Generated article trained on typical Indian media articles, there would be 15 quotes from "Air Marshals" about how the stealth of the J-20 has an inferior radar signature to even the Su-30MKI
Rafale with Meteor can wipe out J-10 from Pakistan and China
Chinese copies of Su-27/30 are inferior copies since India has the original Russian specification
etc. etc.
These are all real claims from actual Indian media, not just a blogger. He actually doesn't make those kinds of outrageous claims. He is absolutely correct that IAF was technologically superior than PLAAF prior to the 90's. I'm not saying this is a good article (for example he totally ignores the far greater number of AWACS and EW aircraft of PLAAF), but I think an AI article would actually be much much worse.
Well tbh if you go back to civil war era, India(British Raj) probably had more and better planes at some point than the PLA. Especially when they were holed up in Yan'an.Very debatable how superior IAF was vs PLAAF in 1980's.
IAF had ~300 Mig-21s (air superiority), ~40 Mig-23MF (air superiority), ~90 Mig-23BNs (fighter bombers), ~250 Hawker Hunters (1st gen 1940's jets), and had just received 36 Mirage-2000s, their first order of 4th gen jets in history, in 1985.
Basically ~400 3rd gen or better air superiority aircraft.
Su-30 MKI was still 15 years away.
In 1985 China had something like 2000+ J-7s and 300+ J-8s. Unlike Indian Mig-21s which were vintage Soviet that they couldn't even maintain themselves, China had fully mastered J-7 and even built the J-7E redesign in 1987.
So India in 1980's still had no chance. They didn't have a qualitative edge and had a massive quantitative disadvantage.
In the 90's, China imported S-300s (1993) and Su-27s (1992) before India imported Su-30 MKI (2002).
So there was never a time when India could beat China in the air.
Very debatable how superior IAF was vs PLAAF in 1980's.
IAF had ~300 Mig-21s (air superiority), ~40 Mig-23MF (air superiority), ~90 Mig-23BNs (fighter bombers), ~250 Hawker Hunters (1st gen 1940's jets), and had just received 36 Mirage-2000s, their first order of 4th gen jets in history, in 1985.
Basically ~400 3rd gen or better air superiority aircraft.
Su-30 MKI was still 15 years away.
In 1985 China had something like 2000+ J-7s and 300+ J-8s. Unlike Indian Mig-21s which were vintage Soviet that they couldn't even maintain themselves, China had fully mastered J-7 and even built the J-7E redesign in 1987.
So India in 1980's still had no chance. They didn't have a qualitative edge and had a massive quantitative disadvantage.
In the 90's, China imported S-300s (1993) and Su-27s (1992) before India imported Su-30 MKI (2002).
So there was never a time when India could beat China in the air.