re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread
Well of course you R, and you basically repeated what I just said, now if you have a source or info that says it won't, I will as always issue a very contrite public apology, but as you stated you R splitting a hair or trying to, your assertion that it has no practical value is also wrong, since if you recover vertically to a damaged airfield that's nice, but you have just lost the use of that valuable asset, unless you are able to depart vertically as well. Its not being sold as vertical take-off as I noted it does so at a very reduced gross weight, just as the B1B is not sold as a supersonic bomber, although it is capable of supersonic flight. brat
I may be splitting hair here, but IMO there is a different between STOVL and V/STOL and I think the flight control system for F35B is specifically designed for STOVL only, which is probably a logical decision, given that vertical-horizontal take off has no practical value. However I do believe that some pilot/aviator may be able to achieve the feat by overriding the auto system with pure manual control, if they are allowed to.
Well of course you R, and you basically repeated what I just said, now if you have a source or info that says it won't, I will as always issue a very contrite public apology, but as you stated you R splitting a hair or trying to, your assertion that it has no practical value is also wrong, since if you recover vertically to a damaged airfield that's nice, but you have just lost the use of that valuable asset, unless you are able to depart vertically as well. Its not being sold as vertical take-off as I noted it does so at a very reduced gross weight, just as the B1B is not sold as a supersonic bomber, although it is capable of supersonic flight. brat