F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Tuesday at 9:07 PM
it's fresh:
Canada Plans to Buy 18 Super Hornets, Start Fighter Competition in 2017

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
now Critics Question Canada's New Super Hornet Plans
The Canadian government’s proposal to buy 18 Super Hornet aircraft as a stopgap measure before proceeding to a full competition for a new fighter jet is not only a waste of time and money but illegal, say political and industry critics of the plan.

Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan announced Nov. 22 that Canada would enter into negotiations with Boeing for the purchase of the 18 aircraft. Sajjan noted the government had been forced to proceed with the urgent acquisition because a capability gap had emerged with the current fleet of CF-18 fighters. Canada cannot meet its NORAD, NATO and other defense commitments with those aging aircraft, he added.

But Canada’s former procurement chief says the Super Hornet deal is illegal and can be challenged if Lockheed Martin or other aircraft firms wanted to do so. Existing trade agreements allow for Canada to proceed with a purchase without competition if there is an urgent and unforeseeable need for goods and services required by the military, said Alan Williams, the former assistant deputy minister for materiel at Canada’s Department of National Defence.

“A capability gap that was allowed to grow over many years is hardly unforeseeable," said Williams. “Bad planning is not an excuse for sole-sourcing.”

Williams noted the Liberal Party government has been in power for a year and already had enough information to launch a full competition for a permanent fighter replacement.

Lockheed Martin officials have expressed their disappointment in the government’s decision to buy Super Hornets but the firm has not indicated its next course of action.

Liberal Party Prime Minister Justin Trudeau vowed his government would hold a competition for a new jet. But he also made an election promise last year that Canada would not buy the F-35 as it was too expensive and didn’t meet the country’s needs.

James Bezan, the defense critic for the Conservative Party, said the CF-18 capability gap issue was concocted to support the sole-source purchase of the Super Hornet. The country’s 77 CF-18 fighter jets are capable of doing the job until a full competition can be held to buy a new plane, he added.

Bezan said the decision to buy Super Hornets as a stopgap solution will end up wasting billions of dollars and valuable time needed to replace the CF-18 fleet.

Sajjan has said it will take at least another five years to run a competition to buy a fleet of jets to replace the CF-18s on a permanent basis. The government has said Lockheed Martin is welcome to enter the F-35 in that competition when it is held.

Questions have also been raised about the validity of the Sajjan’s claim that the CF-18s can’t defend the country.

When Lt. Gen. Michael Hood, the commander of the Royal Canadian Air Force, testified in April before the Commons defence committee, he didn’t mention a capability gap. Instead he told lawmakers the CF-18s could continue operating until 2025 or beyond.

Concern has also been voiced about how the Super Hornet purchase will affect Canadian industry participation in the F-35 program.
Canada has said it intends to continue as a partner in the program but Lockheed Martin suggested several months ago it could reconsider participation by Canadian companies if the F-35 is not purchased.

Brian Pallister, the Conservative Party premier of the province of Manitoba, said the Super Hornet acquisition is not only a waste of tax dollars but could jeopardize aerospace firms involved in the F-35 program.

Pallister said he was particularly concerned about Magellan Aerospace in Winnipeg, a company that makes the tail assemblies for the F-35 as well as other components.

But Navdeep Bains, the government minister in charge of industry and innovation, said any deal for the Super Hornets would bring with it the equivalent amount of work for Canadian firms.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
LM plant to Ft Worth can build easy 150 by year have do for F-16 in 1980's eventualy Italian plant can help right now build only Italians and NL F-35 90 + 37 some build to US then about 120.
Italians and NL F-35s 82 + 29

Exclusive: spotlight on F-35 production in Italy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Nov 3, 2016
Oct 26, 2016

now ... I woke up to Pentagon Moves Forward — Unilaterally — on $6.1B Contract for Ninth F-35 Lot

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


...
... while now Lockheed Scores $1.3B Advance Payment for Tenth Batch of F-35s
The Pentagon awarded Lockheed Martin a $1.3 billion advance payment for the tenth lot of F-35s, but a final deal — originally projected to occur this year — will likely not be settled until 2017, a government spokesman said.

The low rate initial production (LRIP) 10 order covers 90 joint strike fighter aircraft, which will begin delivery in the first quarter of 2018. The final price per aircraft will not be set in stone until a contract is finalized.

The down payment to Lockheed was provided through a mechanism called an "undefinitized contract action" (UCA), which allows the government to obligate funding ahead of a final contract. The UCA modifies an existing advanced acquisition contract to allow the government to authorize up to $7.19 billion for LRIP 10.

The F-35 joint program office hopes to have a handshake agreement with Lockheed “during the next few months” and finalize the deal in 2017, JPO spokesman Joe DellaVedova said in a statement.

“With a complex production line and a dynamic supply chain, it was important to obligate funds via a UCA so that no major delays would be seen in production,” he said. “We are confident the finer terms of the LRIP 10 contract will be settled over the next few months.

According to the contract announcement, LRIP 10 will include funds for 76 F-35As, 12 F-35Bs and 2 F-35Cs, with aircraft going to the Air Force, Marine Corps, Navy and several international partners and foreign military sales customers. The UCA also provides funding for redesign and management of obsolescent parts, non-recurring engineering, unique requirements for international customers, and changes made to the aircraft to correct deficiencies resulting from concurrency between production and development.

The LRIP 10 advance payment was likely in the works for some time. Since August, Pentagon officials, including its acquisition chief Frank Kendall, had confirmed that the government was negotiating a UCA with Lockheed.

In a third quarter earnings announcement in October, the company reiterated that it needed more money to fund F-35 production, and that the lack of a deal had negative effects on its cash flow.

“Despite not yet receiving funding sufficient to cover its costs, the corporation continued work in an effort to meet the customer’s desired aircraft delivery dates,” a Lockheed news release stated. “Currently, the corporation has approximately $950 million of potential cash exposure and $2.3 billion in termination liability exposure related to the F-35 LRIP 9 and 10 contracts.”

Although this is the first undefinitized contracting action authorized for lot 10, the government has relied on such agreements extensively throughout the LRIP 9 negotiations. The Pentagon obligated $625 million to Lockheed through the first LRIP 9 UCA in November 2015. Initially, the JPO anticipated a contract award for both LRIP 9 and 10 in early 2016, but as negotiations stretched on, Lockheed officials claimed that current funding was insufficient to sustain production. The company had already paid about $1 billion out of pocket to its suppliers, Lockheed chief financial officer Bruce Tanner said in July.

hen in August, Defense News reported that another payment of about $1 billion was transferred to Lockheed. In October a further $743 million was added to the existing LRIP 9 UCA.

Lockheed and the JPO were ultimately unable to come to a deal on the LRIP 9 contract, and the Pentagon went forward with a unilateral contract worth $6.1 billion.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
here they go
Developmental test F-35s need service life extension
The Lockheed Martin F-35 hasn’t flown a combat mission yet, but its taxed developmental aircraft need a service life extension.

The Joint Strike Fighter programme intends to award F-35 prime contractor Lockheed Martin a sole source contract in the third quarter of fiscal year 2017, according to a September announcement posted on the Federal Business Opportunities website. Under the SLEP contract, Lockheed will examine the aircraft’s airframe, hardware, software and structure, the Joint Programme Office tells FlightGlobal. The contract, which applies to US and international partners, will also bring the test fleet’s hardware configuration to parity with the new fleet.

“The goal will be to resolve any modifications done to the new production aircraft and operational fleet that the DT aircraft were too busy to accomplish until the end of System Development and Demonstration without major impacts to the SDD schedule,” he says.

Lockheed designed the DT aircraft with a service life of 8,000 flight hours. But unlike the production aircraft, the DT aircraft fly at the extreme ends of their design limits for extended periods in order to gather flight test data, JPO’s spokesman says.

“Extended flight in those regimes will wear out an F-35 faster than F-35s flown in their operational [flight] envelope,” he says. “The operational F-35s can go into the same corners of the envelope, but if so, spend brief times in those areas as it is not tactically feasible to remain there.”

By October, individual aircraft within the DT fleet had clocked between 314 and 1,200 flight hours. The JPO plans to use the full life of DT aircraft for systems aircraft, but will not use the maximum 8,000 flight hours for flight science aircraft that fly at the most stressful corners of the flight envelope. The DT aircraft will be used beyond Block 4 testing.

The test aircraft have gone through a drawn-out process as F-35 developmental test has progressed more slowly than expected. In an October memo, the Pentagon’s top weapons tester revealed that several quick reaction capability software builds pushed back flight test for Block 3F 10 months later than originally planned. And although additional developmental testing is planned, the JPO has planned to truncate parts of that process, Michael Gilmore states in the memo.

In August, Gilmore warned the programme was running out of time and money to complete planned flight testing and modifications.

“Flight test is making progress, but has fallen far behind the planned rate to complete System Development and Demonstration with the remaining time and funding,” the director of Operational Test and Evaluation stated. “Despite needing to continue developmental testing at full capacity for at least another year to complete the planned testing of the new capabilities and attempted fixes for the hundreds of remaining deficiencies, the program is already beginning to reduce the number of test personnel and defer required fixes to beyond SDD due to funding constraints.”
source is FlightGlobal
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
DefenseOne A Glimpse At How the F-35 Will Help the Marines Storm the Beach
In a California demonstration, the short-takeoff fighters escorted troop-carrying V-22s into simulated hostile territory.

Earlier this month, six F-35B Joint Strike Fighters took off from the deck of USS America, a Navy amphibious assault ship off San Diego, California. Four of the Marine Corps aircraft attacked a simulated integrated air defense system on San Clemente Island, while the other two escorted a pair of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that simulated landing Marines on an enemy beach. The Nov. 20 demonstration was a unique “proof of concept” strike/assault support escort mission that also included a Bell UH-1Y
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
helicopter, a Bell AH-1Z Viper, and a Sikorsky
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. This was a test of the so-called “Lightning Carrier”
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, an aircraft carrier loaded with F-35s and Ospreys. The goal: to show how the Marines would use the F-35B during the first, critical stages of expeditionary fighting, perhaps at the start of a major conflict.

Lt. Gen. Jon Davis, the Corps’ top aviation leader, said the F-35B rolls the capabilities of several older aircraft into one:situational awareness, electronic warfare, close air support, air-to-air combat. That makes the V-22 Osprey better at putting boots onto contested ground.

“If I was a bad guy, I would hate the V-22,” said Davis, the Marines’ deputy commandant for aviation. “And if you hate the V-22 out there and you want to try and go after the V-22, the F-35 will create the conditions for success for the V-22 in sanitizing a target area, going after target defenses, [providing] close air support.”

Eventually, the Marines want to integrate the F35B with today’s Sikorsky
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and the coming
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the latter of which is slated to enter service in 2018.

The F-35B has reached a threshold in its long and tortuous journey to its first deployment, to the Marine Corps Air Station in Iwakuni, Japan, in January. After the Marines declared initial operating capability in 2015, the Defense Department’s Operational Test and Evaluation Office
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that the operational test “did not — and could not — demonstrate that the Block 28 F-35B is operationally effective or suitable for use in any type of limited combat operation, or that it is ready for real-world operational deployments, given the way the event was structured.”

There were serious questions about whether the plane’s weapons would function as planned (they’ve since
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), and whether the complex
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, or ALIS, would work.

The Marines said that they had ALIS (version 2.0) aboard the America during their exercises this November and that it was indeed working, albeit with some help from plane builder Lockheed Martin.

Would Davis be willing to send the F-35B into combat by the 2018, which the jet is scheduled to be
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. “I would do it tomorrow,” he said.

“We will deploy on timeline with these other capabilities unless something requires us to go sooner faster. But they’re ready. They’re ready. The nation has its 5th-generation capability that can operate from a sea base and do it tomorrow,” Davis said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
getasset.aspx
from
PICTURES: Japan receives first F-35
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


(LOL I even wanted to put into Japan Thread but it's in Arizona though)
 
F-35 Joint Program Office Saved – for Now
yeah let's see what Donald does about this 'legacy'
The compromise version of the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act protects the F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) from elimination, but requires the Pentagon to report on alternatives for the management of the joint strike fighter by the end of March.

The Senate Armed Services Committee's version of the NDAA, rolled out in May, included language that would disband the JPO after the F-35 reaches full-rate production in April 2019. At that time, control of the plane would devolve to the Air Force and Navy, in essence ending joint control of the jet and turning it into another traditional program.

However, the House rejected that proposal in conference, and instead put in language requiring “the Secretary of Defense, no later than March 31, 2017, to submit to the congressional defense committees a report on potential options for the future management of the Joint Strike Fighter program.”

JPO spokesman Joe Dellavedova said the office "appreciates the support of Congress" for the program.

The committees do want to get input from the Pentagon on how the JPO could eventually be wound-down in the coming years, senior congressional aides told reporters on Tuesday. But for now, there were no changes to the F-35 program structure, although some reporting requirements were altered.

For example, the conference report requires that the Comptroller General of the United States shall provide an assessment of the eventual F-35A IOT&E report, and submit that assessment to the committees within 90 days of the IOT&E report being finalized. That report will include an assessment on whether those conclusions were comprehensive and sufficiently detailed, as well as a list of any concerns with how the report was handled.

In addition, the NDAA also contains language preventing funds from being used to retire the A-10 Warthog, a move in line with previous years. In 2013, the Air Force began a serious push to retire the A-10 in order to free up funds and maintainers for the F-35, but ran into a blockade in Congress. While the service has backed off the idea for now, Congress remains wary of future groundings.

The compromise language did not include an extra 11 F-35 jets that had been proposed by the House Armed Services Committee, although HASC chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas) said Wednesday he hoped president-elect Donald Trump would add those planes back in.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top