F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

advill

Junior Member
The F35 is still the best fighter presently, and can beat all others regardless of minor faults that are being corrected. Care has to be taken that the F35 secrets are not "stolen" by adversaries.
 

Brumby

Major
The F35 is still the best fighter presently, and can beat all others regardless of minor faults that are being corrected. Care has to be taken that the F35 secrets are not "stolen" by adversaries.

No doubt the F-35 is an excellent aircraft just from the various reports of pilots sharing their experience in flying it. However the main utility I believe is the transformational nature of the platform which I think is deeply unappreciated to its effect in the battlespace. I can think of a number of reasons, including :
(a) A multiplier effect on legacy aircrafts. Using datalinks (MADL/BACN/Link16), the F-35's will be able to provide its sensor fusion situational awareness to legacy aircrafts within the mix force structure. This will compress the OODA loop. Studies and exercises have demonstrated the utility of SA in multiplying kill ratios.
(b)Real time information will be pushed to the outer edge of the battlespace ensuring for the first time operational and tactical picture is in alignment. A God's eye view in driving optimal decision making in force deployment, resource utilisation, and to tactics execution across air, sea and land .
(c)Potential to create a networked web of mini awacs in c2 utilisation and to provide redundancy in the event of satellite outage.
(d)Potential to create extended battlespace with allied forces with the F-35 being the common enabler through its sensor fusion capabilities in linking confederated systems.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Meh, no offense but the J-20 is better than the F-35 IMO.
Believe it my Friend please do :)

For A2A combat possible i don't say yes, very close depends some elements you don't have right now ... but for bombing in stealth missions seems no better with arrangements of the weapons bay i don' t see a bomb of 1 t fit in the J-20 weapons bay close F-22 and F-35A/C carry it, even for the T-50 with last view " only " 6 AAM seems and same really no sure 1 t bombs fit in the weapons bay.

In no stealth missions F-35 variants get a payload of 8/9 t max really possible normaly J-20/T-50 also or a little more they are more big.

But sure J-20 and T-50 get avery long range more as F-35A ( C a litte better, B inferior ) which remains very decent and better as F-16/18 he replace and with AV-8 and A-10 a difference !
 
Last edited:

strehl

Junior Member
Registered Member
I guess my OODA loop speculation might be somewhere in the ballpark.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Driven by information, a pilot executes the fifth-generation OODA loop in the same manner as the fourth-generation version, with a few key differences. No longer are the pilot’s eyes his primary means to gathering information nor maneuverability his primary tool for executing the OODA loop, as it was in a one-on-one dogfight. Today’s fighter pilot uses aircraft sensors to collect information and modern tactics to execute the OODA loop as a coordinated flight. Fighters have always flown missions together with wingmen, but an F-35 pilot can maximize the capability of his flight by coordinating with his wingmen like never before. This coordination enables the fifth-generation OODA loop to operate at a rapid pace, generating a new level of effectiveness in both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions.

Designed to gather critical information to feed the OODA loop, the F-35 uses a suite of the most advanced sensors in the world. These sensors include advanced radar, infrared search and track (IRST), an electronic-warfare suite, and advanced data-links. Unique sensor-fusion algorithms integrate these sensors with advanced weapons and tactics to create an OODA loop that no fourth-generation fighter can match.
 

dtulsa

Junior Member
Imho the 35 until it gets the thurs to weight issue greater than one to one cannot be considered a (true) fighter in the sence of the word please correct if I'm wrong no sensor can fix that issue it's been proven time and time again
 

Brumby

Major
Imho the 35 until it gets the thurs to weight issue greater than one to one cannot be considered a (true) fighter in the sence of the word please correct if I'm wrong no sensor can fix that issue it's been proven time and time again
In post #3229, there was posted an interview with an air force officer involved in the F-35 program, and below is a relevant excerpt to address your question :
And really, discussing the F-16 with the F-35 would be like a horse cavalry officer discussing the tank during the First World War.

You know the tank can not jump across the trench like a horse does!
Have you ever seen a tank that jumps like a horse?
 
Last edited:

Brumby

Major
Slimmed-down F-35 Gen III helmet to be introduced sooner

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Pentagon is bullish about resolving issues with the F-35 Lightning II’s escape system that has restricted lightweight pilots of from flying the fifth-generation combat jet, with the joint programme office (JPO) now expecting delivery of a slimmed-down “Gen 3” helmet from Rockwell Collins by November for rollout in 2017.

One US Air Force pilot was transferred to the F-22 Raptor last year after sled tests of the Lockheed Martin F-35's emergency escape system revealed “unacceptable” loads and stresses on mannequin weighing 47kg (103lb) and 62kg (136lb) when ejecting with the newly delivered third-generation helmet. Those loads might break a human pilot's neck or cause serious injury.

Fixes include a switch on the Martin Baker US16E (MK16) ejection seat that delays the parachute's opening “by milliseconds” when occupied by a lightweight pilot, plus a head support panel sewn between the parachute risers. However, a weight reduction for the third-generation helmet from 2.3kg (5.1lb) to 2.1kg (4.6lb) has also been required.

Estimates in February predicted that a helmet solution, which uses lighter-weight materials and has detachable day and night visors, would have lagged ejection seat modifications by “eight to nine months”. Lockheed, Rockwell and other suppliers have since promised to deliver it sooner, officials say.

“We’ll have our first Gen 3 light helmets now aligned with the seat in November of 2016, so we can remove the restriction for the lightweight pilots weighing under 136lb,” Bogdan said at a forum in Washington DC earlier this month. “We’ve tested helmets with similar mass properties, and we think it’s going to work.”

On 29 March, the programme office confirmed that November delivery date, and said one test asset is already on hand to validate that a reduced weight helmet will indeed reduce the likelihood of a serious neck injury during ejection, in combination with Martin-Baker’s seat modifications.

“Those three fixes will be in place this year,” a spokesman says. Those changes will be gradually rolled out across the fleet and cut into aircraft production beginning in 2017.

The heavier, third generation Helmet Mounted Display System (HMDS) replaces a less-capable model and both are produced by Rockwell Collins and Elbit Systems of America’s Vision Systems International joint venture. The first operational third-generation helmet was delivered in August.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Imho the 35 until it gets the thurs to weight issue greater than one to one cannot be considered a (true) fighter in the sence of the word please correct if I'm wrong no sensor can fix that issue it's been proven time and time again

Well you know what they say about opinions?, and yours is in DIRECT CONFLICT with USAF, Marines, USN, and each of our partners, in addition to each and every F-35 pilot currently checked out and flying test or operational missions.

Now then, there are a few vocal, il-informed, and down right ignorant folks who are in complete and total agreement with you??? You my brother have the advantage over each of them, in that you are member, in good standing of the finest Military Forum on the planet, the SDF. So I would suggest IMHO that the most intelligent course of action for you my brother, is to get yourself in line with the very well informed, well educated, operationally informed by the performance of the actual aircraft, folks who really do know what it takes to design/develop/build what is becoming one of the most amazing tactical aircraft ever to serve??

Its always best "dtulsa" when you are putting your hard work and time into a post, that you strive to "learn" where the people with a "dog in the fight" stand, and stand with them! Those with NO skin in the game love to voice their il-informed opinions, which sadly will go on the internet for all to see and form an "opinion" of you? I would encourage you to strive to maintain the accuracy and good will that SDF is known for.

and my sincere apology for being so frank, but I really do believe your are trying to put forth an "honest opinion". I have done a complete 180 on my thinking regarding the F-35 since I began posting, due to the kind and consistant informed opinions of Mr. Jeff Head, BD POPEYE, Mr. Brumby, Engineer, etc, etc,.
 
Top