While its certainly true that you can't cancel what you haven't bought, it is also clear that a sale not made is effectively the same as a lost sale (quantity being a factor in the per unit cost of the plane).
Actually, it is not even close to being the same.
In one case you have a commitment with the appropriate financial considerations, logistical consideration, and planning already in work, all of which have to be stopped in the event of a cancelation. And that cancelation itself may incur costs on the one canceling it.
In the other you have...well, nothing comparable. No commitment. You have people talking about it.
Zarkon said:
High downward heat from the STOVL version wasn't compatible with the Oz LHDs.
This is the case for all LHA/LHDs considering the F-35B. The BRAVO it is hotter than the Harriers and was something that was already well understood when the PM asked for the RAN to look at it.
They did and determined that it was more expensive than they wanted...and I will be you that the real expense they wanted to forego was not the revamp of the deck and hanger spaces necessary. That would have been cheap compared to the cost of the aircraft.
IMHO, they simply decided that the cost of buying and them maintaining 12-20 F-35Bs for the two Canberras was simply too much for what they expected to get out of it. Cost benefit analysis from Australia's stand[point failed.
HAving made thaty decision, they are putting the best face on it that they can. But it was Australia's decision to make, and for their own reasons and benefit weighting analysis. Now they have done so.
I might add...that in the future there is nothing that would keep them from reconsidering that decision if the vulnerabilities and geo=political situation changed to the point where their calculus changed. The aircraft will be there for some time to purchase...and the vessels will also be there and capable of being modified.
At this point, like Kwaig, I doubt it will happen...but you never know. Things can change.