F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

navyreco

navyreco

Senior Member
F-35Bs go back to sea...


Six US Marine Corps F-35B Fighters Started Operational Trials On Board USS WASP
Six U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II jet aircraft arrived Monday evening aboard the USS WASP off the coast of the United States’ Eastern Seaboard to mark the beginning of the first shipboard phase of the F-35B Operational Test (OT-1).
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Jeff Head

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
navyreco said:
F-35Bs go back to sea...

Six US Marine Corps F-35B Fighters Started Operational Trials On Board USS WASP
Six U.S. Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II jet aircraft arrived Monday evening aboard the USS WASP off the coast of the United States
Click to expand...
Huzzah! six at once!

That's a typical full load for the Wasp Class LHDs of STOVL strike aircraft.

Really glad to see this and can't wait for the pics!
 
S

strehl

Junior Member
Registered Member
Jeff Head said:
Huzzah! six at once!

That's a typical full load for the Wasp Class LHDs of STOVL strike aircraft.

Really glad to see this and can't wait for the pics!
Click to expand...


So far only 4 aircraft visible in posted pics at DVIDS.

bH2Gc2T.jpg



GEzYi4R.jpg
 
Jeff Head

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Okay, strehl, here's five hig res pics I found of the event ( a couple the same pics you showed:

Six US Marine Corps F-35B aircraft are aboard the USS Wasp, LHD-1, for operational testing for the next two weeks. Six aircraft is a full squadron of US Marine strike fighters for these LHD vessels and this testing will represent full operational testing with flight operations, maintenance, logistics, repairs, etc.

Here are some of the initial pictures.


2015-0519-F35B-Wasp-01.jpg

Four F-35B Lighting II Joint Strike Fighters sit secured to the deck after their arrival aboard the USS Wasp (LHD-1), May 18, 2015. Six aircraft are participating in full operational te4sting aboard the Wasp from May 18-June 1st.

2015-0519-F35B-Wasp-02.jpg

Two F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters complete vertical landings aboard the USS Wasp (LHD-1) during the opening day of the first session of operational testing, May 18, 2015. Six aircraft are participating in full operational te4sting aboard the Wasp from May 18-June 1st.

2015-0519-F35B-Wasp-03.jpg

An F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter idles on the flight deck of the USS Wasp (LHD-1) in preparation for take-off, May 18, 2015. The short take-off, vertical landing capabilities of the F-35B are crucial to the mission of the Marine Corps and necessary for operation aboard a Navy amphibious ship

2015-0519-F35B-Wasp-04.jpg

Marines and sailors aboard the USS Wasp (LHD-1) secure and refuel an F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter after its arrival for the first session of operational testing, May 18, 2015. Data and information gathered from OT-1 will lay the groundwork for F-35B deployments aboard Navy amphibious ships and the announcement of the Marine Corps' initial operating capacity of the F-35B in July.

2015-0519-F35B-Wasp-05.jpg

An F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter after a vertical landing aboard the USS Wasp (LHD-1) during the opening day of the first session of operational testing, May 18, 2015
​
 
Jura The idiot

Jura The idiot

General
describes manned-unmanned teaming etc.:
Air Force’s New Unmanned Strategy Has F-35 Pilots Flying Drones
An
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
pilot will one day control a small fleet of nearby drones from the cockpit while in flight — according to a new
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
report on autonomous systems, Air Force Chief Scientist Mica Endsley said.

The Air Force is poised to unveil a new strategy for unmanned aircraft systems next month. The report will discuss more teaming with manned aircraft such as the F-35, greater levels of automation and a wider scope of missions for UAS — such as transporting cargo.

“We see unmanned vehicles being used for a much wider variety of missions,” Endsley said in an interview with Military.com. “Today they are primarily used for ISR, long duration missions where we want to collect information. In the future, they will be moving cargo and more manned-unmanned teaming where they are acting as extensions of a manned aircraft.”

The new Air Force report, called “Autonomous Horizons,” will highlight plans to improve sensors, develop new algorithms and introduce new unmanned platforms.

The Air Force currently flies
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
drones remotely using pilots to navigate from a ground control station. The new strategy calls for additional unmanned platforms and also explains that existing UAS will be increasingly engineered to perform a wider range of functions without needing human intervention – such as data analysis.

“They are going to be smarter in terms of algorithms to handle things like mission planning and collecting data and analyzing that data to take the load off of the human component of a system,” Endsley added.

Endsley said the Air Force will likely begin developing the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
planes for unmanned missions, allowing the aircraft to reach high-risk forward locations with supplies, weapons and ammunition.

Manned-unmanned teaming wherein manned aircraft control the flight path and sensor payload of a nearby UAS while in flight is emphasized in the report as critical to the Air Forces’ future plans.

For instance, an Air Force F-35 Joint Strike Fighter might have several UAS assigned to it to perform a variety of missions from ISR to off-board weapons delivery in dangerous or hard to reach areas, Endsley explained.

“We are setting up the ability for an aircraft to take high-level command of UAS. Those unmanned aircraft will have to be capable of flying in concert in a safe manner. They will need to be capable of taking high level commands and be able to execute those effectively,” she added.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
has advanced manned-unmanned teaming technology in its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
fleet –successfully engineering
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
air crews to control UAS flight paths and sensor payloads from the air in the cockpit.

Senior Air Force leaders have said that the services’ new next-generation bomber program, Long Range Strike Bomber or LRS-B, will be engineered to fly manned and unmanned missions.

Also, in September of 2013, the Air Force and Boeing flew an unmanned
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at supersonic speeds for the first time at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The unmanned fighter was able to launch, maneuver and return to base without a pilot.

Despite these developments, Endsley emphasized that software algorithms have not yet progressed to the point such that a remotely flown fighter jet can maneuver and react to fast-changing dynamics in a combat environment anywhere near as effectively as a manned jet.

There is often a two-second long lag time before a UAS in the air can respond to or implement directions from a remote pilot in a ground station, a circumstance which underscores the need for manned pilots when it comes to fighter jets, she said.

“One of the reasons you would go to an unmanned technology is to be able to go into more dangerous areas than you want to send humans or to fly longer duration missions. You have to weigh what the right kinds of things to fly unmanned are. Not every mission should be done unmanned. There is a long time lag with remote control. Those time lags can be very difficult for rapid response flight dynamics,” Endsley said.

As a result, Endsley explained that the Air Force is much more likely to use autonomy for ISR and cargo missions as opposed to fighter aircraft missions.

“I don’t think that fighter aircraft are a good target for that kind of autonomy,” she said.

While computer processing speed and algorithms continue to evolve at an alarming pace, it still remains difficult to engineer a machine able to instantly respond to other moving objects or emerging circumstances, Endsley argued.

“I don’t believe we will see fully autonomous systems overnight. We are going to see a slow evolution in that direction as we add autonomy to different functions in the cockpit for different functions in the analysis process or in the cyber arena. We want to be sure that we have effective human-autonomy teaming so that people are still going to be able to do their jobs – automation can increase workload if it is not easy to use,” Endsley said.

In contrast to the Air Force’s apparent position that growth in unmanned technology is not expected to replace pilots of fighter aircraft anytime soon, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus recently said the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will likely be the last manned strike fighter ever bought by the Navy.

However, Endsley and other experts in autonomous navigation technology made the point that it is very difficult to engineer a machine able to quickly react to unanticipated circumstances.

“Trying to teach a computer to have the same kinds of perceptual capabilities that people have is very difficult. They have gotten better at object recognition but understanding the context in which that object is operating could be difficult,” she said.

For example, an aircraft might succeed in being programmed to locate a specific target but might lack to ability to properly interpret the surrounding context and civilian casualties, Endsley explained.

Also, when it comes to the potential use of lethal force, an existing DoD policy directive requires that a human always be in the loop – regardless of how quickly autonomy develops.

“You can have a lot of variability in situations and it is very hard to program systems to handle every situation. People, on the other hand, are much more able to deal with novel or unforeseen circumstances,” she said.

One analyst agreed with Endsley.

“You need humans for situational awareness,” said Richard Aboulafia, vice president of analysis at the Teal Group, a Virginia-based consultancy.
Click to expand...
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top