F-35 Joint Strike Fighter News, Videos and pics Thread

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

Apparently the problem with the arrestor hook has been solved!:eek:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Cha-Ching! Yah, has been for some time, carrier quals are scheduled for October aboard the Nimitz, go Navy er Marines, or whoever go Lockheed Martin! C is the prettiest, all that extra wing just looks good, but then all pilots like big Wings on their birds!

Marines will be buying/flying Cs as well as Bs. >>> Discussion has already moved on. Let it rest <<< I sighted in my Rock River today with a Redfield Battlezone, nice bright glass for the money, but shooting skills translate across mediums, the B and C will both have a gun-pod, kinda disappointing. The point the Marines are making is that "connecting" with the target takes "marksmanship."

>>> Discussion has already moved on. Let it rest <<< Not saying I get in on all the military butt kissing just because some-one has earned the right to wear the uniform, and yes they do earn it, but flying is dangerous, and an intellectual challenge for the best men.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread


>>>>>>>>>> MODERATOR'S INSTRUCTIONS <<<<<<<<<<

The discussion about the Marine fighter pilots and their skills has been settled. It has been sufficiently shown that they are not sub par.

No need to bring it back up again on either side.

Thanks.

Do not respond top this moderation.



>>>>>>>> END MODERATOR'S INSTRUCTIONS <<<<<<<<
 
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

It wasn't Just the Marines but the Europeans who wanted VTOL. And Sticking with Harriers was not a option. they are wearing out fast, difficult to fly and have a dwindling life expectancy as Airframes are lost due to age and attrition due to the difficulty of flying them.

this post came to my mind once I noticed this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


but, TE, only now I gave Like to this post :)
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

this post came to my mind once I noticed this:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


but, TE, only now I gave Like to this post :)

One of the UK test pilots of the AV-8, stated that the Harrier took an Octopus to fly, and the F-35B was a "piece of Cake" in comparison. I takes a superior aviator to stay ahead of the Harrier, and having seen some ejections on you-tube, when she starts to get snotty, you better "get out" while you can, to my knowledge the Harrier would be a royal krap to try to "deadstick" and engine failures "always" occure when you are "kritical", but in a single engine aircraft, as soon as it quits, you are certainly kritical,,,,,,, (yes, I am Teutonic, and besides I like the letter K)!
 

delft

Brigadier
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

One of the UK test pilots of the AV-8, stated that the Harrier took an Octopus to fly, and the F-35B was a "piece of Cake" in comparison. I takes a superior aviator to stay ahead of the Harrier, and having seen some ejections on you-tube, when she starts to get snotty, you better "get out" while you can, to my knowledge the Harrier would be a royal krap to try to "deadstick" and engine failures "always" occure when you are "kritical", but in a single engine aircraft, as soon as it quits, you are certainly kritical,,,,,,, (yes, I am Teutonic, and besides I like the letter K)!
In a twin engine STOVL jet it would be just as kritical.
 
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

F-35 Canada:
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Canada is poised to buy 65 Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets, sources familiar with the process told Reuters, marking a major renewal of Canada's fighter fleet and helping contain costs of the expensive defense program.

An 18-month review of Canada's fighter jet needs has concluded that the government should skip a new competition and proceed with the C$9 billion ($8.22 billion) purchase, three sources said.

The decision must still be finalized by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's cabinet. The government is likely to face fierce criticism from opposition politicians concerned that the contract is being awarded without an open competition. Similar concerns over sole-sourcing and costs derailed the purchase two years ago.

A spokesman for Harper's office said there was nothing to announce yet.

However, the sources said the recommendation was expected to lead to formal approval of the F-35 purchase. They said Harper and key cabinet members supported the decision.

Canada's planned purchase is the 6th-largest by a country and would further safeguard the $399 billion program. Its rising costs had sparked fears of a "death spiral," in which countries cut plane orders, driving up the price of remaining planes and triggering further cancellations. (Full Story)

The Pentagon recently estimated the average price per plane at $139 million, about twice the original estimate in 2001, but said the projected cost to operate and maintain the jets was down 9 percent from earlier estimates.

Ottawa announced in 2010 it would buy 65 jets but scrapped the decision in late 2012 after an official watchdog said Canadian officials had grossly downplayed the high cost of maintaining and operating the jets.

The Canadian government then launched a multi-agency examination to determine whether to buy the F-35 or launch a new competition. That review has found that the F-35 is the only warplane that meets the government's needs, said the sources, who were not authorized to speak publicly.

A four-member panel of outside experts set up to ensure the objectivity and impartiality of the Canadian review also is expected to give its blessing to the process in coming weeks and may make its own recommendation that Ottawa proceed with buying the F-35, said one of the sources.

ANNOUNCEMENT DUE SOON

The Canadian government has said it will make an announcement in coming weeks, around the time the Canadian Parliament is dismissed for the summer.

Public Works Minister Diane Finley declined comment on Tuesday about the timing of a decision.

“Once we have made a decision we will announce it, and the reports will be released,” she said.

The opposition New Democratic Party decried the review as secretive and designed to provide cover for the original decision to buy the plane.

"We have a public tendering process in this country, and sole-sourcing is not part of it," NDP Member of Parliament Jack Harris said. "We want a transparent process. This is not a transparent process."

The recommendation to proceed with the F-35 purchase was expected, the sources said, in part because the cost of each plane has recently declined. Other factors seen as influencing the outcome of the review was the decision by Japan, South Korea and other countries to buy the jet. Canadian firms could win up to $11 billion in potential business orders linked to the program, they said.

Canada would be the 11th country to buy the jet. It was one of the original nine partners on the F-35 program, contributing $150 million to its development costs.

One of the reports completed as part of the review showed that a new tender would take three years to complete, which would force the Canadian Air Force to spend about $20 million per plane to keep its fleet of older Boeing CF-18 "Hornets" flying, according to a source familiar with the findings.

Russia's annexation of the Crimea region of Ukraine, which has created tensions with European countries, the United States and Canada, also underscored Canada's need for a fifth-generation stealth fighter, said two of the sources.

The F-35 is designed to be the next-generation fighter jet for decades to come. No other new fighters are in the pipeline and the warplane fleets of the United States and Canada are aging.

Canada's participation in the program would help Washington drive down costs, which U.S. officials say are finally heading lower after rising 70 percent over initial estimates.

The total cost of the F-35, the Pentagon's most expensive weapons program, is now estimated at $1.42 trillion, down about 6 percent from $1.50 trillion from last year, including research, development, procurement and operations through 2065.

A spokesman for the Pentagon's F-35 program office said officials were awaiting Canada's decision and understood the country's need to revisit the decision process.

A spokesman for the Pentagon's F-35 program office said officials were awaiting Canada's decision and understood the country's need to revisit the decision process.

But it would spell more bad news for rival bidders, including Boeing Co BA.N, which is urgently looking for orders to keep its F/A-18 production line running past 2016. Boeing argued that its fighter would be cheaper for Canada to buy and operate. The Eurofighter Typhoon and Rafale fighters, both European planes, were also in the running.

Lockheed spokesman Mike Rein said the company supports the Canadian government's process in determining the best way to replace its CF-18s.

Boeing declined to comment.
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

58 FS complete with 26 F-35A

The 58th Fighter Squadron at Eglin AFB, Florida, became the US Air Force's first complete F-35A Lightning II squadron on 28 May 2014 as the twenty-sixth and final A-model aircraft was delivered to the base near Fort Walton Beach. Maj. Scott Charlton, a 58th FS pilot, ferried the aircraft (Air Force serial number 11-5034) from the Lockheed Martin facility in Fort Worth, Texas. The first F-35A was delivered to Eglin on 14 July 2011. The 33rd Fighter Wing at Eglin is home to the F-35 Integrated Training Center responsible for F-35 A/B/C Lightning II pilot and maintainer training for the US Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force and, in the future, at least eight international partners.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Next for Luke and Hill...

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
re: F-35 Joint Strike Fighter Thread

I just found this (hope it's not a cross-post):

By Air Force News Agency on Friday, June 6th, 2014

In the Point Mugu Sea Test Range airspace off the Central California coast, an F-35B demonstrated the jet’s air-to-air combat capability when it sequentially engaged two aerial targets with two AIM-120 Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles during a Weapon Delivery Accuracy mission.

Test pilot and 461st Flight Test Squadron commander, Lt. Col. Andrew Allen, tracked two maneuvering drone targets, making the very first dual AMRAAM shot from any F-35 variant, and the first live AMRAAM shot from the F-35B Short Take Off and Vertical Landing (STOVL) variant.

“The U.S. Marine Corps, which operates F-35Bs, will be the first military service branch to attain combat-ready Initial Operational Capability in 2015,” said J.D. McFarlan, Lockheed Martin’s vice president for F-35 Test & Verification. “This Weapon Delivery Accuracy test highlighted the air combat capability that will give Marine aviators a decisive combat edge in contested airspace.”

The F-35′s internally-carried AIM-120 AMRAAMs are a beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile capable of all-weather day-and-night operations and considered a “fire-and-forget” missile using active target radar guidance.

Also flying out of Edwards AFB, an F-35A flew a 1.9 hour mission with the first-ever load of Block 3i hardware and software. Block 3i is the next level of capability and is planned to support U.S. Air Force F-35A Initial Operating Capability in 2016.

The two flight tests out of Edwards May 27 were part of three F-35 major milestones on the same day.

On the East Coast, the F-35C, designed for aircraft carrier operations, completed a landing at its maximum sink speed to test the aircraft’s landing gear, airframe and arrestment system at Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md. “Five sorties were conducted, building up the maximum sink rate test condition of 21.4 feet per second, which represents the maximum sink speed planned for this test,” McFarlan said. During the tests, the F-35C did three arrestments, several touch and goes and one bolter. The landings were to demonstrate structural readiness for arrested landings on an aircraft carrier at sea.

Fleet-wide, the F-35 has, to date, amassed more than 17,000 flight hours.

Read more:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Top