I found this discussion with respect to the paradigm shift of American strategy towards China from engagement to pretty much all out (minus kinetic war) intense rivalry illuminating, since the presenter discussed the confluence and heavy contingent of "China experts" that proliferates in Washington D.C. from the so called engagers to the most anti-China hawk that's pretty much invaded and control the China narrative that's emanating from Washington.
What an informative piece of research and such incredibly thoughtful discussions afterwards. I have long admired the tiny fraction of American academics in the geopolitical sphere that have achieved deep understanding of the world while being able to maintain objectivity and a humanist principle. I am particularly fond of Goldstein, who was in the audience and made some really insightful comments (others were great too), because he can so eloquently cut through those ideology covered mumbo jumbo to defend hegemony.I found this discussion with respect to the paradigm shift of American strategy towards China from engagement to pretty much all out (minus kinetic war) intense rivalry illuminating, since the presenter discussed the confluence and heavy contingent of "China experts" that proliferates in Washington D.C. from the so called engagers to the most anti-China hawk that's pretty much invaded and control the China narrative that's emanating from Washington.
The Trifecta of Business, Military, Press relationship in shaping and changing the narrative on China we're all witnessing today speaks about the short term thinking of Washington, combined with their assumptive belief on the American manifest destiny that it's their divine providence to shape the world and countries accordingly. Take for example that it was only as early as 2015 when then National Strategy for China was released under the 2nd Obama administration where it spelled out the intention of engaging China long term and managing their competition within constraints to avoid potential Military conflict. Only for the strategy to change 2 years later under a new regime of Pres. Trump essentially doing an about face by making China not just a pressing threat but a threat that must be dealt with for existential reasons. And the once marginalized "China hawks/experts" were now manning the control of the ship and the academics, politicians, Military branches that wants to see their respective careers, departments blossom $$ have to jump aboard the anti-China bandwagon.
Anyway, I digress...hope a lot of the folks here manage to take the time to watch this discussion.
@horse bro about Francis Fukuyama idea that the End of History had arrived meaning "Self Implosion or System Collapse"? Like the Roman's before the heavy weight of the empire The Center simply collapse leading us to The Dark Ages. You can see the comparison and it's eerily similar.The even older Marxist theories, I am not a Marxist, (well, maybe I am, lol, I don't know) that Imperialism always leads to war.
The Americans are still kind of like an Imperial power, like the old days of the Age of Imperialism.
They do not go around invading everybody and set up traditional colonies like the British Empire. The Americans go around enforcing rules that puts America first.
It is not really Imperialism, but I have no idea how else we accurately describe it. Just say it is sort of like Imperialism. A new form of it, maybe, who knows.
------------------- -----------------
Now the Chinese, the CCP really are Marxist!
And they know Imperialism can only lead to war!
So the CCP was fully prepared to take on the Americans, or Imperialist, in every which way.
To say China is not doing anything, is simply incorrect. The Chinese are Marxist, the Marxist believe Imperialism only leads to war, and the Americans are Imperialist-like even though they deny it. CCP knows what is going on.
That is why this game is interesting.
It is a game of everything, haha!
Fun to watch.
We can get banned for getting too much into it, lol.
Hope people return, we need the laughs.
Hehe.
Another article written by the usual empty suit anti-China hawk, but this time appearing to be sobering up to the grim outcome of a contest between two nuclear powered rivals. I hate to say this, but America in order to cure it's severe sickness and addiction to war must lose at her best and experience humiliation in order for her society to fix their war disease.What an informative piece of research and such incredibly thoughtful discussions afterwards. I have long admired the tiny fraction of American academics in the geopolitical sphere that have achieved deep understanding of the world while being able to maintain objectivity and a humanist principle. I am particularly fond of Goldstein, who was in the audience and made some really insightful comments (others were great too), because he can so eloquently cut through those ideology covered mumbo jumbo to defend hegemony.
On the other hand, what the discussion pointed out is something very troubling. The US military/interstrial/intellegence/thinktank sphere has large vested interests in the US hegemony and wars. Normally I wouldn't care because it just lead to its own demise. But now they are squarely pointing at China. One can't help but worry what future is ahead of us. Just look at this:
The way they talk about nuclear war like breakfast and basically try to leverage the US' geographical advantage for large scale wars to protect whatever US interests is just evil. There is nothing more dangerous than a righteous man and there are just so many of them in the US.
What an informative piece of research and such incredibly thoughtful discussions afterwards. I have long admired the tiny fraction of American academics in the geopolitical sphere that have achieved deep understanding of the world while being able to maintain objectivity and a humanist principle. I am particularly fond of Goldstein, who was in the audience and made some really insightful comments (others were great too), because he can so eloquently cut through those ideology covered mumbo jumbo to defend hegemony.
On the other hand, what the discussion pointed out is something very troubling. The US military/interstrial/intellegence/thinktank sphere has large vested interests in the US hegemony and wars. Normally I wouldn't care because it just lead to its own demise. But now they are squarely pointing at China. One can't help but worry what future is ahead of us. Just look at this:
The way they talk about nuclear war like breakfast and basically try to leverage the US' geographical advantage for large scale wars to protect whatever US interests is just evil. There is nothing more dangerous than a righteous man and there are just so many of them in the US.
@horse bro about Francis Fukuyama idea that the End of History had arrived meaning "Self Implosion or System Collapse"? Like the Roman's before the heavy weight of the empire The Center simply collapse leading us to The Dark Ages. You can see the comparison and it's eerily similar.