Discussing Biden's Potential China Policy

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15887
  • Start date
hullopilllw

hullopilllw

Junior Member
Registered Member
siegecrossbow said:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
what is the point.
US will sanction China 1 day before said meeting.
then after meeting, Biden will say some grand posturing nonsense like he has warn and will be punishing China for misbehaving/not following "rules-based order" ( make up lies like hacking, malign influence, unfair policies)

Then fly back to Washington and continue salami slicing TW island.
 
S

SimaQian

Junior Member
Registered Member
It should be held in Urumqi near a mosque. Or maybe in mosque grounds. So that the world can see how all their lies about Xinjiang. No more red carpet, closing of Forbidden city.
 
Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
hullopilllw said:
what is the point.
US will sanction China 1 day before said meeting.
then after meeting, Biden will say some grand posturing nonsense like he has warn and will be punishing China for misbehaving/not following "rules-based order" ( make up lies like hacking, malign influence, unfair policies)

Then fly back to Washington and continue salami slicing TW island.
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1415606577353039876
 
j17wang

j17wang

Senior Member
Registered Member
hullopilllw said:
what is the point.
US will sanction China 1 day before said meeting.
then after meeting, Biden will say some grand posturing nonsense like he has warn and will be punishing China for misbehaving/not following "rules-based order" ( make up lies like hacking, malign influence, unfair policies)

Then fly back to Washington and continue salami slicing TW island.
Click to expand...

Exactly, no need for a garbage summit. China should focus on summits with Russia or Europeans. What is the point of an American summit? They gonna sanction us anyways, try to undermine china's soverienty, spread lies. Xi and Biden can do a zoom call for 30 minutes. Nothing further is necessary.
 
Hendrik_2000

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
hullopilllw said:
A good read for the night.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
Yes excellent here is the paragraph I like most. This show the duplicity socalled "rule based system"

The chief mechanism for defeating China was spelled out in 2017 by Harvard foreign policy analyst Graham Allison, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, in his book Destined for War: Can America Escape the Thucydides Trap?, a work highly praised by Biden, former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger, and former CIA director and former commander of the U.S. Central Command David Petraeus. In Allison’s words:

US forces could covertly train and support separatist insurgents. Fissures in the Chinese state already exist. Tibet is essentially occupied territory. Xinjiang, a traditionally Islamic region in western China, already harbors an active Uighur separatist movement responsible for waging a low-level insurgency against Beijing. And Taiwanese who watch Beijing’s heavy-handedness in Hong Kong hardly require encouragement to oppose reunification with this increasingly authoritarian government. Could US support for these separatists draw Beijing into conflicts with radical Islamist groups throughout Central Asia and the Middle East? If so, could these become quagmires, mirroring the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan where U.S.-supported mujahideen “freedom fighters” bled the Soviet Union?
A subtle but concentrated effort to accentuate the contradictions at the core of Chinese Communist ideology…could, over time, undermine the regime and encourage independence movements in Taiwan, Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong. By splintering China at home and keeping Beijing embroiled in maintaining domestic stability, the US could avert, or at least substantially delay, China’s challenge to American dominance.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
All of this is now New Cold War policy.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Moreover, by attacking China with allegations of “genocide” and “crimes against humanity” in relation to its internal populations, the United States is able to justify its New Cold War on China, including its actual hybrid warfare, combining an array of political, economic, financial, technological, cyber, and more traditional overt and covert military means.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
BoraTas

BoraTas

Major
Registered Member
Hendrik_2000 said:
Yes excellent here is the paragraph I like most. This show the duplicity socalled "rule based system"

The chief mechanism for defeating China was spelled out in 2017 by Harvard foreign policy analyst Graham Allison, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, in his book Destined for War: Can America Escape the Thucydides Trap?, a work highly praised by Biden, former U.S. secretary of state Henry Kissinger, and former CIA director and former commander of the U.S. Central Command David Petraeus. In Allison’s words:


All of this is now New Cold War policy.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Moreover, by attacking China with allegations of “genocide” and “crimes against humanity” in relation to its internal populations, the United States is able to justify its New Cold War on China, including its actual hybrid warfare, combining an array of political, economic, financial, technological, cyber, and more traditional overt and covert military means.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
They lost in Hong Kong and Tibet. They are losing in Xinjiang too. As disgusting as it would sound China needs to retaliate against such attempts by India and the US. China should allow the production of fentanyl again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top