CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Which shipyard is building 002? JNCX ?

I would like to think that DL and JNCX each build 002

That's 2 x CATOBAR

Most likely this place
likely tobe constructed at new carrier line at SE.Follow ups at NW.Notice villages cleared
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
at HDZH

C-V4VeyWsAEskqf.jpg


C-V4XsGXYAAS1BZ.jpg


Type 75 likely dry dock
C-V5s8TW0AEAM9b.jpg
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
CD (short for CJDBY) confirms with the same post: Type 002 has started construction, larger than 001A, smaller than Kitty Hawk, will feature odd number of catapults (definitely 3).

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Looking forward to the next carrier saga now that 001A's in the water. We won't see much visible progress on her now, with only fitting-out to do.

The next big thing to wait for 002 imo is confirmation to settle whether it's steam or em cat.
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Can someone revived the thread/posts about the bet many of us did back like 2 or 3 yrs ago etc? I've forgotten the specifics other than it was about future PLAN carriers.
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Can someone revived the thread/posts about the bet many of us did back like 2 or 3 yrs ago etc? I've forgotten the specifics other than it was about future PLAN carriers.

https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/plan-2nd-3rd-aircraft-carrier-wager-planning.t7361/

CONDITIONS OF THE SD 2ND/3RD PLAN CARRIER WAGER:

1) If a second carrier is not seen being built somewhere in the PRC by September 1st, 2016, then PanAsian's persuasion wins the wager hands down. If that build does occur, then the best Pan Asian can get out of the deal is a draw.

2) If a 3rd carrier begins building before June 1st 2020, PanAsian loses the wager hands down.

Any other outcome produces a draw.

RESULTS OF THE WAGER (WHAT'S AT STAKE):

If the people indictating that a 2nd/3rd carrier will not be built lose:

They post a profile picture: of multiple Chinese carriers, and keep it for a year.

If the people indicating that a 2nd/3rd carrier will be built lose:

The post a profile picture of a no circle/slash over a Chinese carrier, and keep it up for a year.

In both cases, if construction photos are shown before the deadlines for the 2nd or the 3rd carriers, that are only actually verified to be the carriers later than the deadlines, as long as they were pointed out before the deadlines, if they do turn out to be a carrier later they will count.

SD Members supporting the Single Carrier thought:
PanAsian, Shenkus, TerraN_EmpirE

SD Members supporting the Multiple Carrier thought:
Blackstone, Bltizo, Jeff Head, SinoSoldier, kwaigonegin, Brumby, Delft
 

Blitzo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
a nice speculation CGI of 002... of course it's only speculation.

Not too many big mistakes although one issue seems to be the strange location of what I assume to be the weapons elevators, which in their position when they descend seem like they won't go anywhere

002 mere speculation.jpg
 

cirvine11

New Member
002型について

OedoSoldier added,
Don't know how reliable is this
1. Three steam catapult installed
2. The drainage volume is about 1.4 times that of Liaoning (more than 80000 tons full) 3. Length is more than Liaoning, but lessthan Kitty Hawk Width is longer than Kitty Hawk 7 to 8 m
3. Deployment of 36 aircraft 4. Construction started in Shanghai this year

CgineJeUYAE0Zar.jpg
I'm sorry to sound obtuse but just to be clear-you're saying the 002 will carry a total of 36 aircraft?
 
Last edited:

J16B MRF

Junior Member
Registered Member
a nice speculation CGI of 002... of course it's only speculation.

Not too many big mistakes although one issue seems to be the strange location of what I assume to be the weapons elevators, which in their position when they descend seem like they won't go anywhere

View attachment 38294
With respect……It seems what I see on this ship are 4 S band radars and 4 smaller X band?(above S band radars)
 
Top