That kind of proves my point, by the time US began to face problems in their ship mounted EMALS, China's program was already close to finish, nothing major can be learnt from US since the problems have not fully manifested and cause were not clear, solution was not in place. The two (China and US) programs are just too close in progress for anyone to learn lessons (if anything) from one another.The shore installation with one catapult and one energy storage was without these problems. The ship installation with four catapults and three energy storages has the problems.
Storage is not the only problem, AAG had even bigger troubles which shares the same tech as EMALS. We know this for two years at least, there was a congressional report on the subject. I was wondering if the post this time is telling some newly founded problems. It seems not.