they are not connected so there gaps in between, also, there could be more modules, so any estimation on waterline length is unreliable.
If there is an urgency to greatly scale up naval buildup, lets say China suddenly decides to build three or more carriers simultaneously. Will there be enough skilled workers to meet this target? Let's say China decides to enter a wartime economic state.
If there is an urgency to greatly scale up naval buildup, lets say China suddenly decides to build three or more carriers simultaneously. Will there be enough skilled workers to meet this target? Let's say China decides to enter a wartime economic state.
I think yes. I feel, they are building a very good management system around their work, write down every thought and every step, so it is possible to scale up wotkforce very easy keeping a good quality.If there is an urgency to greatly scale up naval buildup, lets say China suddenly decides to build three or more carriers simultaneously. Will there be enough skilled workers to meet this target? Let's say China decides to enter a wartime economic state.
Very optimistic.we will start to see this carrier come together very quickly
those modules are built and now all they need to do is get them put together
if we know one thing, that is Chinese shipyards are best at that stage of the work and getting it launched
Very optimistic.
It is a brand new design, without prior assembly experience.
The previous two carrier building was helped by the original drawings, manufacturing instruction modified by assembly / testing experiences, and with the original Ukrainian staff helping out the Chinese builders.
this time the shipyard has to found out all design issues/ mistakes on the go, and during local testing.
Considering that the carrier built like an onion, any issue with the core systems will make it impossible to test the later systems .
Means five, 6 month issue will shift the delivery date by thirty month.
Via @利刃斩海飞剪艏 from Weibo