CV-18 Fujian/003 CATOBAR carrier thread

by78

General
Some magazine images from her first sea trial.

53814196545_a69270a4bd_k.jpg
53814092409_fe243c07f7_k.jpg
53812830407_0fddbea604_k.jpg
 

venturer

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Nope..If like USN carriers those are just bumpers so tugs can safely maneuver the ship when entering and leaving port.

They are indeed just push bumpers, or at least that seems to be their primary purpose. Here are a pair of screen grabs from the first sea trial video showing this.
 

Attachments

  • vlcsnap-01.jpg
    vlcsnap-01.jpg
    238.7 KB · Views: 149
  • vlcsnap-02.jpg
    vlcsnap-02.jpg
    346.6 KB · Views: 164

zgx09t

Junior Member
Registered Member
If I'm not mistaken, they are rubber fender strips for mediterranean mooring, a vestige of Soviet's inadequate port infrastructure, where they had to moor a naval ship with the astern at right angle to the quay. I believe you can still discern the landing plate and long gangway itself tucked in right above those fenders. Russian carriers would have couple of those gangways tucked at the astern.
 

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
If I'm not mistaken, they are rubber fender strips for mediterranean mooring, a vestige of Soviet's inadequate port infrastructure, where they had to moor a naval ship with the astern at right angle to the quay.

Considering that USN carriers have it, that doesn't really make sense. Also the soviets didn't do mediterranean mooring with carriers, and as a matter of fact the Kuznetsov never had them nor the Ulyanovsk was going to have them either.
 

sheogorath

Major
Registered Member
Take a good look at her round ass. If you looked for it hard enough, there're a few med mooring photos.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The argument is that the rubber bumpers on the CV-18 and other carriers with them, were for mediterranean mooring, which they weren't. As have been said multiple times, its just to help tugs, plus as boat landing platform for tenders, barges and taking people ashore in case they couldn't dock pierside.



gospoxjv6w961.jpg
bush.JPG

The Kuznetsov class doesn't have any kind of easy access from the stern to be doing any mediterranean mooring, either

unnamed (1).jpg

.
 

zgx09t

Junior Member
Registered Member
I stand corrected for what I wrote ; you explained better than what was my original thought process, which from hindsight was missing a few steps in transition to what I actually meant to say. Nevertheless, I concede to your point.

Kuznetsov did have old black and white photos showing her with med mooring, but that maybe for another time.
The dimple in the buttcheek was where the big shore round fender/s would sit and two gangways in the back were used for people exiting in and out.

See the picture herein at dry dock. They put a longer bigger gangway to access and exit from that back entrance , instead of using existing shorter skinnier ones tucked in behind. Soviet wouldn't put those in place if they didn't intend to use, which is especially handy when you do the med mooring. China does not need to go that route as whole berthing infrastructure was built for each AC to moor alongside. Hence the word vestige. But anyway, I digress.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top