The whole point of the post was that this offered something that should if true be verifiable a incontrovertible fact. These alleged transcripts were uploaded early today and the original links will have been noted, even if subsequently deleted. The links and the date stamps should be "provable" and if so raise some very difficult questions.
Ukraine winning on the ground? Have you been on holiday or asleep?
Until midday on the 17th the situation in the Donbass was this:
The Southern Brigade of the Ukrainian army was surrounded and hemmed against the Russian border and being taken apart, piece by piece - want to see the pictures?
Last weekends armoured assaults on Lugansk had been defeated and Ukrainian forces were falling back and giving up villages that had recaptured.
On top of that Europe was not following America's lead on Sanctions and could not even agree who to replace Rhumpy and Frumpy with as President and Foreign Representative of the EU, as Old and New Europe countries were blocking each others candidates, deadlocked on the Russian policy.
Then MH17 happened...........
LOL...you should know by now that someone like him don't take newsfeed anywhere other than CNN/BBC/Fox, and indeed, if you goes by those only, you'd missed out that 3 Ukrainian Army brigades - the 24th, 72nd and 79th - are now squeezed between the rebels and Ukraine-Russia border region, and the terrain reminds you of Dien Bien Phu or those in Korean War...and that's what I did, have to brush up on things to see not all is good for the Ukrainian Army in this conflict.
That's why immediately I suspect somebody want to "toss in game changer" when I first heard of the news, alas under other suspicion I admit, but all things considered it still smells that way. Not sure who'd have the final say on the MH17 flight plan (Malaysian Airlines denied that they picked that flight path for the sake of fuel economy) but why nobody at the Ukrainian ATC told MH17 to fly on other flight corridors instead of flying pass the war zone?
Also, the Buk SAM system, the suspected "murder weapon", what is its "minimal requirement" when comes to personnel to achieve a baseline operational capability? Sure enough this ain't like MANPAD that can be operated by infantry with very basic training, it'd need specialists and even just a TELAR vehicle would require 4 men (according to wiki article, a TELAR by itself is enough to perform the whole kill-train process), yet the militia is predominately infantry-vocation personnel (that is, those who are ex-military), not specialist-trained SAM personnel.
So far, a lot of things don't make sense, but if in the next few days things escalate into NATO/US/Russia muscle in over this incident, we might finally have a good idea on who'd have a vested interest in having the MH17 being sacrificed.