Coronavirus 2019-2020 thread (no unsubstantiated rumours!)

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Since last few days I have been thinking about this solution-
Keep all older people and people having less immunity in lockdown. Keep them regularly supplied.

The 'normal' people should start working.

It sounds insane/inhuman but what's your take on this?
I actually think that a lot of old people in the States are practicing better social distancing than younger people. Around 40% of people tested positive in New York are young people.
 

localizer

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"About 0.37 percent of the people in Gangelt who were found to have the virus died. The mortality rate there is five times lower than in the rest of Germany. According to data from John Hopkins University, the rate for all of Germany is currently 1.98 percent. According to the researchers, the reason why apparently fewer people in Gangelt die from the consequences of a corona infection is that a particularly large number of people were tested there. Including many that show hardly any symptoms and often go undetected. The numbers suggest that the coronavirus could be less fatal than feared. However, it was still too early for a reliable projection."Heinsberg slipped past a huge catastrophe" According to the researchers, the numbers suggest that the lockdown was the right decision to contain the number of infections. "Heinsberg slipped past a huge disaster," said the district district administrator, Stephan Pusch."
 

Quickie

Colonel
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

"About 0.37 percent of the people in Gangelt who were found to have the virus died. The mortality rate there is five times lower than in the rest of Germany. According to data from John Hopkins University, the rate for all of Germany is currently 1.98 percent. According to the researchers, the reason why apparently fewer people in Gangelt die from the consequences of a corona infection is that a particularly large number of people were tested there. Including many that show hardly any symptoms and often go undetected. The numbers suggest that the coronavirus could be less fatal than feared. However, it was still too early for a reliable projection."Heinsberg slipped past a huge catastrophe" According to the researchers, the numbers suggest that the lockdown was the right decision to contain the number of infections. "Heinsberg slipped past a huge disaster," said the district district administrator, Stephan Pusch."

That's some good news. I think Jiangsu province, China, have had zero fatality out of the final tally of more than 800 that was confirmed to be infected with the virus. I believe a few other provinces in China also had good outcome approaching , if not better than, 0.3 percent (not counting imported cases).
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
That's some good news. I think Jiangsu province, China, have had zero fatality out of the final tally of more than 800 that was confirmed to be infected with the virus. I believe a few other provinces in China also had good outcome approaching , if not better than, 0.3 percent (not counting imported cases).

They spared zero expense in Jiangsu. One of the patients required double lung transplants and they did it free of charge.
 

Quickie

Colonel
Correction: Current tally for Jiangsu is 0 fatality against 651 confirmed cases (all local cases, 633 or so, were cured before the inclusion of imported cases.)
 

0Fox0

New Member
Registered Member
If this report is true then we can establish several facts and need to ask a few important questions.

Facts:

1. Every news claiming "China didn't tell us / we didn't know" from the usa is a propaganda.
2. The usa did nothing to prepare for the “cataclysmic event” for months

Questions:

1. Why didn't the usa warn China and warn the world about this “cataclysmic event” if they had early knowledge? Why did they stay silent?

2. China knew about a “cataclysmic event" and covered it up for two months.
a. Does this sound logical to you?
b. Why aren't more people dead if the “cataclysmic event” was covered up for 2 months? Something does not add up.
c. What caused China to do a 180 from a cover up to full lock down? What was worse than a “cataclysmic event”? Again, something does not add up.
d. Why was the ophthalmologist, Dr. Li, only given a verbal reprimand to stop spreading rumors and quickly released safely back into the public. Wouldn't the Chinese government want to silence him to cover up the “cataclysmic event”

3. Why haven't other expert investigators from the likes of the World Health Organization (WHO) been able to unearth this enormous cover-up? There should be mountains upon mountains of evidence. So far, only the US intelligence and military agencies had early knowledge of this.

4. Why haven't other spy intelligence agencies from other nations discovered the cover up. So far, only the US intelligence and military agencies had early knowledge of this.


Article below...

U.S. intelligence officials warned in November that the coronavirus spreading in China’s Hubei region could become a “cataclysmic event,” ABC News reported Wednesday.
The military’s National Center for Medical Intelligence (NCMI) documented concerns about the initial stages of the pandemic in an intelligence report, two officials familiar with the document told ABC News, which added that the document highlighted how the virus was disrupting life and business and threatened the population in the area.
Intelligence was reportedly obtained through wire and computer intercepts along with satellite images showing the new disease was not under control in China.
The report highlights that officials had knowledge to begin acting against the coronavirus months before it struck the U.S., ABC News noted.
"Analysts concluded it could be a cataclysmic event," one of the sources told the network, who added that the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Pentagon’s Joint Staff and the White House were briefed "multiple times."
After the NCMI report, policymakers, decisionmakers and the National Security Council at the White House were repeatedly briefed on the issue, a source added.
The coronavirus first appeared in the President’s Daily Brief of intelligence matters in early January, according to ABC News.
Those who worked on presidential briefings in Republican and Democratic administrations said the initial concerns would have gone through weeks of vetting and analysis before appearing in the daily brief.
"The timeline of the intel side of this may be further back than we’re discussing," a source said of preliminary reports from Wuhan, the city considered the initial epicenter of the outbreak in China. "But this was definitely being briefed beginning at the end of November as something the military needed to take a posture on."
The Trump administration has repeatedly said it could not have prepared for the pandemic, but the president’s critics have said the administration should have done more.
As of Wednesday morning, almost 400,000 Americans have tested positive for the virus, with at least 12,911 deaths, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.
The Pentagon and the White House National Security Council did not immediately return requests for comment on the ABC News report.


US intelligence warned in November that coronavirus spreading in China could be 'cataclysmic event': report | TheHill
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

AssassinsMace

Lieutenant General
I read this article. What about the counter argument that most of those from Europe actually got infected from someone who in turn got infected in China?
Also despite knowing the fact the patient zero in Italy was from Germany some channels were circulating the theory that Italy was the hotspot because it is the country that had the most extensive links with China.

That's not the point of the article. Trump claims he saved millions of people stopping travel from China. He didn't stop travel from Europe until much later. East coast cases of coronavirus, especially New York, which are far higher than other metropolitan areas in the rest of the US are because of travel between the US and Europe being New York was the gateway there. The article has nothing to do with assigning who to blame for coronavirus in general. Trump claimed he saved millions is meaningless since he left the door to Europe open.
 

duncanidaho

Junior Member
I read this article. What about the counter argument that most of those from Europe actually got infected from someone who in turn got infected in China?
Also despite knowing the fact the patient zero in Italy was from Germany some channels were circulating the theory that Italy was the hotspot because it is the country that had the most extensive links with China.

The italian strain of the SARS-CoV-2 is a different one than the Wuhan-China strain.

"ABSTRACT
In a phylogenetic network analysis of 160 complete human severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) genomes, we find three central variants distinguished by amino acid changes, which we have named A, B, and C, with A being the ancestral type according to the bat outgroup coronavirus. The A and C types are found in significant proportions outside East Asia, that is, in Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the B type is the most common type in East Asia, and its ancestral genome appears not to have spread outside East Asia without first mutating into derived B types, pointing to founder effects or immunological or environmental resistance against this type outside Asia. The network faithfully traces routes of infections for documented coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, indicating that phylogenetic networks can likewise be successfully used to help trace undocumented COVID-19 infection sources, which can then be quarantined to prevent recurrent spread of the disease worldwide. "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Since the pandemic in italy started a lot of media in Germany and Austria blamed the chinese community for the spreading of the virus, but they didn't found any evidence!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:
Top