So the author/editors had the choice of two ways of framing the report:
1. Inactivated vaccines have been crucial - now immunity is waning
2. China's COVID vaccines have been crucial - now immunity is waning
The first is accurate and scientific, the second is inaccurate and political. But they just had to go with the second.
In any case I would read this article along with:
So apparently people who first got infected then vaccinated have a broader immunity to different variants of the virus. Some theorized that it might have to do with actual infections prime the body for all parts of the virus and not just the spike protein. Someone should research to see if the same benefits are provided by inactivated vaccines. It might turn out to be the case that inactivated vaccines + a more targeted booster provide broader immunity than vaccines targeting the spike protein alone.