b787
Captain
i do not think that is the case, airliners buy safety and profits. just think if you will fly what aircraft do you trust more? A well proven B-737 or a MS-21 or C919? people have concerns when they do not know something, airliners sell tickets when they sell safety, and they demand from the manufacturers safety and profitability meaning less fuel per kg and passenger and the most serviceability with the least maintenance since once an aircraft is sold several airliners will buy it only if it is cheap to operate and the safest.That has to do more with media stereotype than actuality of high tech commercial planes. There are plenty of Chinese quality products that doesn't get recognition. Didn't the naysayers say the same thing about China's UAV having trouble getting foreign buyers, until Iraq military and others show off it off?
If you look the statistics you will find B-737 has the same accident rate than several Russian aircraft like Tu-204 but slightly better than Tu-154, however people buy B-737 because it is cheap to operate and offers you better engines, Russia solved that with the MS-21, but still some airliners might buy the MS-21 with western engines and avionics rather than Russian due to reliability.
C919 does not offer anything in the west Airbus or Boeing have since the engines are Western and same many subsystems, further more China has not proven their ARJ-21 a success, this really affects the program, for China to succeed they need to prove they are safe and more maintainable than Airbus or Boeing.
Why? the C919 might be cheaper this does not mean it is safer or more maintainable, once it flies the West will re-engine their aircraft, so for Comac they need to pack they jet with technologies that prove it is safer and cheaper to operate than Airbus and Boeing.
Russia could not compete due to lower (very slight lower safety) and slightly less serviceability due to inferior engines (older engine types) than all the Western aircraft this forced the russian airliners to buy western types.