Climate Change and Renewable Energy News and Discussion

AF-1

Junior Member
Registered Member
There are always news about adding new capacities, what about data of currently ACTIVE installed capacity, without those out of function, from decade or more ago? It is not possible to maintain all solar/wind capacities ever installed...
 

dingyibvs

Senior Member
There are always news about adding new capacities, what about data of currently ACTIVE installed capacity, without those out of function, from decade or more ago? It is not possible to maintain all solar/wind capacities ever installed...
That's not gonna be a factor until exponential growth stops. Solar panels can last 20+ years, even installation from 10 years ago is negligible compared to today.
 

antwerpery

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This really does prove that Trump is his own agent and what makes him so unpredictable and dangerous. The free market is clearly in favor of renewables, his own private group of tech oligarchs should want a strong renewables industry too, considering how much power demand growth is expected for A.I. Renewables are the really the only energy source that can keep up with such rapid growth in demand. And of course Musk and his EVs. But nope, Trump does what he wants.

This won't kill the renewable industry in America, the free market favors it too much. But it will slow it down a lot, especially with how unstable American business policy is, complete 180 degree policy changes every 4 years is not good for business. More importantly, it's not just Trump of course, a decent sized portion of his base, from governors, to small business owners, to your average joe will also throw up roadblocks for renewables and EVs wherever possible, just to own the Libs. Which is how we get shit like this and rolling coal. They will just grow more emboldened under Trump.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China already has a massive lead and America shot itself in the foot, again.
 
Last edited:

canonicalsadhu

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This really does prove that Trump is his own agent and what makes him so unpredictable and dangerous. The free market is clearly in favor of renewables, his own private group of tech oligarchs should want a strong renewables industry too, considering how much power demand growth is expected for A.I. Renewables are the really the only energy source that can keep up with such rapid growth in demand. And of course Musk and his EVs. But nope, Trump does what he wants.

This won't kill the renewable industry in America, the free market favors it too much. But it will slow it down a lot, especially with how unstable American business policy is, complete 180 degree policy changes every 4 years is not good for business. More importantly, it's not just Trump of course, a decent sized portion of his base, from governors, to small business owners, to your average joe will also throw up roadblocks for renewables and EVs wherever possible, just to own the Libs. Which is how we get shit like this and rolling coal. They will just grow more emboldened under Trump.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

China already has a massive lead and America shot itself in the foot, again.
IMO this is one of the most consequential decisions of Trumpism/MAGA... A relatively good discussion about US "petrostate" vs China "electrostate"
 

doggydogdo

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
“There exists a temporary structural overcapacity, as the current expansion of new type energy storage is outpacing the market needs.

Energy storage is so cheap that there's an overcapacity of them, this is actually so crazy. solar + storage is going to replace fossil fuel a lot faster than we once thought. Also, this shows how massive Chinese electricity consumption growth is that additional solar power is used up before it could even be stored.
 

dingyibvs

Senior Member
what needs to be done before it is practical?
Energy output needs to be higher than energy input, for one. Right now the output/input ratio often dubiously use the energy input of the step directly before the fusion reaction (e.g. the energy of the laser in an ICF) rather than the whole system energy requirement to calculate the ratio. Oftentimes that step is only like ~1% of the actual input, resulting in misleading headlines claiming positive energy gain when it's nowhere near that.
 
Top