PSed with a pic of J36 to fit the paper of NWPU,someone before had made a comparison.
A friend just sent me these two in reply to my CCA post on X:
View attachment 157288View attachment 157289
If it is true such a VG aircraft would have more range and better low speed and low altitude performance.
There is in fact more evident to point toward this is the aircraft mentioned in the patent than it is not, the planform is an exact match for the patent while assuming the newer pictures are real, the intake and landing gear both matches nearly 100 percent as well.I think for the moment - unless new evidence appears - we should stop promoting this „whatever it is“ as a VG-aircraft!
There is in fact more evident to point toward this is the aircraft mentioned in the patent than it is not, the planform is an exact match for the patent while assuming the newer pictures are real, the intake and landing gear both matches nearly 100 percent as well.
variable wing sweep? Inb4 the F-14 copycat commentsThe NWU paper indicates that its design is a variable-sweep-wing aircraft. I'm not going to speculate on its impact on its supposed all-aspect stealth, but it would at least partially explain why recent photos of this mysterious aircraft/CCA seems to have different wing configurations.
The paper diagram:
View attachment 157392
The recent sightings of this airframe:
View attachment 157393View attachment 157394View attachment 157395
The possibility of PS notwithstanding, it is possible that the aircraft in these images look "different" because its wings might be at different sweep angles. Compare the first and middle photographs for example. The rightmost image - assuming that it's the same aircraft - likely shows its wings at a minimum sweep while the leftmost image shows wings at their maximum sweep.
Again, this is just a semi-serious guess. And this all banks on the aircraft being real and not PSed in any way and the NWU paper being related to this airframe.