Naomi Wu aside I'm surprised that Chinese civilian drones industry already have complex control system like that
lovely girl, who is she?
Naomi Wu aside I'm surprised that Chinese civilian drones industry already have complex control system like that
This is another drone tested in ChinaTo be fair, China's got a great variety and depth of drones along with associated technologies - hardware and software. I really don't think Turkey has much if anything to offer China in drone tech at all to be worth any exchange in technologies. If any Chinese fighter technology is transferred to Turkey, it would be through sales.
The "superpower" in question may indeed be India as India has been unable to make a single drone type apart from their attempt called Rustom, a really backwards MALE drone for 21st century standards. However, Turkey's fighter industry I'd argue isn't behind India at all and I reckon Turkey's subsystems in many areas are equal or well ahead of India's. Certainly better managed. So there's really absolutely nothing in 5th gen fighter tech Turkey can exchange or buy from India. I would bet on Turkey's TF-X going into service sooner than AMCA going into service.
lovely girl, who is she?
This is another drone tested in China
Surely not, that’s a F-35 … looks faked like the X-47 images recently postedThis is another drone tested in China
Checked OP from weibo and appraently the poster claims this is a early development test model from 601, specifically to test the flight control system. He also posted 3 lines with the picture that may be research paper titles or areas of development. They're as such (please excuse my limited English vocabulary):Surely not, that’s a F-35 … looks faked like the X-47 images recently posted
Getting off topic for a UAV thread now but I'll just chime in with one last opinion. I think in the near term there's no desperate need for China to develop too much VTOL capabilities, they are only really used in a naval setting where the main advantage of a VTOL is its ability to take off on a short runway (amphibious assault ships), freeing up the supercarriers to carry heavy fighters, most of China's potential conflict zone will be within land-based fighter range and they're not fighting half way across the world, so deck space is less of a concern compared to the US navy, it's a nice technology to have, but not strictly necessary for any of China's near term goals.Around early 2010s china send a group of engineers interviewing yakolev engineers about the possibility of reopening the production for yak141 vtol jet among people being interview including the test pilot ,the pilot provided the techical shortcoming particularly flight handling for yak 36 and yak 141,a chinese engineers believe the problem can sove by incorporating AI .
Few year latera small and blurr image of a vtol uav power by small jet appear.in the web,tyerecare rumor of vtol jet under devlop.some said it could be twin engine vtol.