AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
You don't see the two distinct humps from the RQ-170 nor the intake. Other than that it looks like every other flying wing design.
Chinese UAV/UCAV development
- Thread starter AssassinsMace
- Start date
- Status
broadsword
Brigadier
It's just so cliche to suggest China reverse engineer whenever a design resembles a Western one.
by78
General
Don't know, and unfortunately, I don't have the video.
I know that the GPS jammer can block the signals of the gps tracking device and gain me a safe condition. So I bought a GPS Jammer to help me then and now I can drive without being tracked now.Not want to being tracked and have their own privacy and space, almost everyone want to stay in such kind of condition and the can be a good assistant now.
Last edited:
It is a fact that reverse engineering has taken place, not only the Chinese but also the Japanese and South Koreans as in other areas e.g. vehicles, smart-phones, computers etc. It is Important to always keep ahead in technology, and some "secret developments" as in advanced UAV & UCAV etc. should be kept secret (IF possible). Prying eyes and ears have intensified these days. Also, young scientists in Asia are highly tech-savvy too.
broadsword
Brigadier
So a Chinese UAV resembled the RQ-170, that does not mean China reverse engineered the craft. If you're going to design an aircraft based on the design of a flying wing and one that's is stealthy with a single jet engine, they are going to look a lot similar. Even the UK UAV looks similar. Unless, it is found that China has a copy of the RQ-170.
What fact? Please provide a link to the claim that solid evidence had been found that the Chinese had reverse engineered the UAV and UCAV.
The commercial organisations and the respective agencies know the facts, but will not reveal them, neither will the copy-cats admit. These days effected parties are no longer naïve but will continue to keep track of the recalcitrants, whoever they may be.
So in another word... there is no hard evidence, only the vague mentioning of "commercial organisation ad respective agencies knowing of facts but will not reveal them".
Was sometime like, "I know who the murderer is, but will not say anything. And the murderer will not admit it, so we put the murderer that we know who he/she is to death, without any other proof. After all, we know who he/she is." and "We know there are weapons of mass destruction in country A." and when ask where, "we will not reveal it. And of course Country A will not admit to having weapon of mass destruction." then we go bombing the hell out of country A.
Okay we get it
Last edited:
- Status