Chinese shipbuilding industry

A

antonius123

Junior Member
Registered Member
t2contra said:
You still have no clue why? You were saying they regain #1. Well, what happened the next month?

My friend, the year is not out yet. If at the end of Dec, Korea wins more orders only then you can say they regain. Otherwise, it could be premature.
Click to expand...


Here we go again ... a semantic debate on my statement. :D

I repeat: regain #1 what I meant is not the whole or at the end of year 2021, as you, me, and everybody knows that 2021 has not end yet!

And I have make a clarification on my statement, that what I mean by regain in 2021 is @ Q1 2021. And you keep insisting that my first statement semantically is wrong! in spite of my clarification. So obviously there is a problem with you regarding me.

Then tell me, why it is not a semantic debate? :)
 
broadsword

broadsword

Brigadier
antonius123 said:
From yesterday you keep insisting on correcting me regarding the Korean surpassing China on sales, on and on.

Chinese semiconductor industry

Of course the shipbuilding is not only about LNG carriers, but the LNG carriers is the most premium and cutting edge commercial ship product, only several country can produce it. The excellence in LNG carrier will signify the mastery/leadership of commercial shipbuilding technology. You were...
www.sinodefenceforum.com

And now you are saying that your intention is just to give a valuable update? and questioning my honesty? cmon. Isn't debate on interpretation of my statement (Korea regain #1 position in 2021 or Q1 2021) is not a semantic debate? :rolleyes: :D
Click to expand...

Of course, it is not. Otherwise, everyone who post the latest info could be accused of using semantic. Posting the latest info is for the benefit of everyone. Unfortunately, only you here seem to be offended by it.
 
A

antonius123

Junior Member
Registered Member
t2contra said:
Of course, it is not. Otherwise, everyone who post the latest info could be accused of using semantic. Posting the latest info is for the benefit of everyone. Unfortunately, only you here seem to be offended by it.
Click to expand...

Starting from here ...

1620999324911.png


You have been debating with me in circle regarding this from yesterday, until now.

How come you said you: "just give update"? and accuse me of getting offended? :D Pls be honest to yourself at least....:D
 
Last edited:
broadsword

broadsword

Brigadier
antonius123 said:
Starting from here ...

View attachment 72020


You have been debating with me in circle regarding this from yesterday, until now.

How come you said you: "just give update"? and accuse me of getting offended? :D Pls be honest to yourself at least....:D
Click to expand...

Your reaction to my update post tells a lot. My first post to yours was about the latest data, but you kept coming back with how Korea was more advanced in LNG. Why so butt hurt? Who does not know Korea is more advanced in shipbuilding let alone LNG? You are not honest with your feeling LOL.
 
Last edited:
A

antonius123

Junior Member
Registered Member
t2contra said:
Your reaction to my update post tells a lot. My first post to yours was about the latest data, but you kept coming back with how Korea was more advanced in LNG. Why so butt hurt? Who does not know Korea is more advanced in shipbuilding let alone LNG? You are not honest with your feeling LOL.
Click to expand...

When did I come back pushing you that? show me the post to prove your word ....

You are keeping coming back for the same semantic debate on and on, make me have to repeat the same explanation on and on LOL.

Yes I am honest in debating with you; just show me where I am dishonest, just the way I have shown you how you are dishonest with your claim ;)
 
broadsword

broadsword

Brigadier
antonius123 said:
When did I come back pushing you that? show me the post to prove your word ....

You are keeping coming back for the same semantic debate on and on, make me have to repeat the same explanation on and on LOL.

Yes I am honest in debating with you; just show me where I am dishonest, just the way I have shown you how you are dishonest with your claim ;)
Click to expand...

Plenty. But instead of littering this thread, I am replying via PM and that will be where I conduct our discussion.
 
A

antonius123

Junior Member
Registered Member
t2contra said:
Plenty. But instead of littering this thread, I am replying via PM and that will be where I conduct our discussion.
Click to expand...


You have littered this thread with repeated semantic debate and repeated denials, and have tried to show ppl how I am wrong semantically with so many baseless accusations in circle debate, and now suddenly you are reluctant to show evidence of your accusation (the easiest part if any) here? or maybe you cant bcs you realize your accusation is just a lie as many other accusation of yours? LOL.

Go ahead with your PM ;)
 
Last edited:
broadsword

broadsword

Brigadier
antonius123 said:
You have littered this thread with repeated semantic debate and repeated denials, and have tried to show ppl how I am wrong semantically with so many baseless accusations in circle debate, and now suddenly you are reluctant to show evidence of your accusation (the easiest part if any) here? or maybe you cant bcs you realize your accusation is just a lie as many other accusation of yours? LOL.

Go ahead with your PM ;)
Click to expand...

It's already there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top