Chinese shipbuilding industry

G

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
tacoburger said:
PWR are pressurized. Aka, they can explode if when there's any issues and you need large concrete structures to contain the reactor. A molten salt reactor should in theory be smaller, lighter and safer. Also this is likely using fluoride, not sodium. Sodium reactors are classified under liquid metal reactors. Pure sodium isn't a salt.
Click to expand...
It makes little difference. Fluoride is also toxic, and solidifies if you shut down the reactor. Try reading about the Soviet Alfa class submarines to know why putting reactors like that on vessels is a bad idea.
 
S

supersnoop

Major
Registered Member
tphuang said:
I just find it surprising if they are able to get molten salt reactor in shipping at this point. The technology is so new that it's hard for me to fathom being ready for ships.

Maybe they got it mistaken with pebble bed reactors?
Click to expand...
Story of a the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor power plant project in South Africa
1. We are far into detailed design, look at this simulation of a 747 smashing into the building housing the reactor!
2. We are so close to operation!
3. We are so close to operation!
4. Project Cancelled
 
by78

by78

General
'Green', intelligent tankers and carriers.

53381308621_2a65d9b754_h.jpg

53381485498_fdf2c51bbe_h.jpg

53381485478_1e1bef6ba9_h.jpg
53381308526_6f649ae82f_h.jpg
53381628054_bcb5bafd1f_h.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top