by the way, SMSC fab itself had enough ASML scanners all along, so it never made sense for SMEE scanners to be used there. It was always assumed that SMEE scanners were tested in JingCheng or one of their other 28-55nm fabs. So if your evidence is K9010 vs 9020, that's really not valid evidence.I don't have links but I've been shown conversations with people in the industry (plus circumstantial evidence, such as an identical node between Kirin 9010 and 9020a which indicates a lack of equipment change) that indicate that the SSA800i was never used in production. I'm aware that this isn't ideal and you're free to distrust what I say, but I stand by that the source I got it from is credible.
As to what's actually happening with SMEE? No idea. There's some talk in other forums that SiCarrier/Huawei poached some of the SMEE people but there's been pretty much no news.
It's entirely possible that SiCarrier had a higher goal and target all along and that they have been able to create a better product with the same supply chain that SMEE had access to. And now SMIC is finding their scanners to be sufficient to validate for 7nm process.
However, none of this indicates that SMEE scanners aren't good enough for 28-55nm nodes or that their Arf dry scanners aren't sufficient for 65-90nm node.
And by the way, many of the steps in FinFet production only need a lower spec'd scanner.