What nuke? What do nukes have to do with this semiconductors thread?
Please move this discussion to another thread
Chinese semiconductor industry
- Thread starter Hendrik_2000
- Start date
- Status
Please move this discussion to another thread
Geopolitical risks and semiconductor are all linked.
If China didn't do the SCS islands to protect its nuke subs, US would not wage such cold war against China even with MIC2025 because such cold war is also costly to US.
But China has to do that SCS thing. All its eastern sea is too shallow, its nuke subs can easily spotted.
I wish China begin it's Indeginous drive in 2001 before SCS.
From 2001 to 2010, China has achieved semiconductor independence and achieved big economy status is the ideal situation
Last edited:
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
That's cus you made it up. The SCS has no consequence to China being able to fire nukes at the US from land or from sea.
That's your imagination. You are the public and know nothing more than the public.
From 2001 to 2010, China was developing in every way it could. It missed no opportunity except random cherry-picked things. And the heat was lower back then simply because China was too weak to be in striking range of challenging the US. Once China is in that range, it's gonna be noticed. If it weren't for China being so powerful now, the US would be preoccupied with Iran. You're so focused on sneaking around and hoping to avoid confrontation that you fail to realize that if China wants to rise above America, it's going to have a confrontation and win it. There is no escape.
Your imagination from your analysis which is proven wrong virtually every time.
SCS is about resources, not subs. Chinese subs can go into international deep waters anywhere; it has nothing to do with nuclear strategy.
It did; it was just at a lower level because China was at a lower level.
Yeah, it'd be ideal if China had it in 1949 and held the world by chokehold on lithography before ASML had a chance. We're living in the real world, not the ideal one.
Last edited:
You slapping yourself.
Now you said no escape and before you said China cannot project confrontation with US eventually and begin it's Indeginous drive earlier
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
And yet it is all of your arguments that have fallen on the ground.
Oh, your poor English is dragging this conversation down... There is no escape of an eventual confrontation if China is to overtake the US but that confrontation should be kicked as far down the road as possible because China becomes stronger in relation to the US as the time goes on. Did you understand that sentence? Was it too long/complicated for you?
Why is TSMC allowed in China so that they can squeeze SMIC? TSMC should be constraint in China, even if they invest in China and create jobs and healthy competition there. The CCP should demand that TSMC plant in China be partly owned by Chinese entities, so that the profit can be recycled within China itself.
D
Deleted member 15949
Guest
What if I told you that photoresists aren't the only type of chemical in the world?
Back when TSMC got 16nm into production in China SMIC had no 14nm.
ZeEa5KPul, running out of real debate and now switch to English level discussion, lol
2001 to 2010 US was too busy on something else to confront China on anything.
- Status