Now that’s just trolling…It is a sign of strong demands of Mate 60 pro and ample of chips to make them.
What if this breakthrough is mostly local and not US?Huawei and SMIC did something incredible, but the accusations from the US aren't untrue, are they? How clean from american products do you believe the supply chain for the kirin 9000S is? Maybe the majority of tools are domestic, Japanese and ASML, but it seems hard to believe that there isn't a single American piece of equipment in the supply chain.
If that's the case, then they have broken american law, for which I applaud them, as american law doesn't apply in China and imposing foreign sanctions is probably illegal under Chinese law. Nevertheless, the senators aren't wrong that Huawei and SMIC haven't obeyed american sanctions and it's therefore justified to cut them off completely from any american tools
You are mixing two different fires. The one Pendemic is taking about is from 2022.
The one that prevented SMIC EUV machine happened in 2018. SMIC ordered the EUV in 2018. US started pressuring the Dutch as soon as SMIC gave the order. But ASML was on track to deliver the machine to SMIC in early 2019. Then the fire happened in December 2018 and ASML announced that all EUV machines for 2019 delivery has been delayed due to the incident. Then few months into 2019 the US was successful in forcing the Dutch to implement the ban.
sabotage to prevent tech transfer to China, playing dirty just like bombing the North Steam pipeline to suck EU into the Ukraine war.Actually, I believe it was rumored they were about to ship the first EUV over. Your link somewhat suggests this may have been true:
"As to EUV, the fire affected part of the production area of the wafer clamp, a module in our EUV systems. We are still in the process of completing the recovery plan for this production area and determining how to minimize any potential impact for our EUV customers, both in our output plan and in our field service."
sabotage to prevent tech transfer to China, playing dirty just like bombing the North Steam pipeline to suck EU into the Ukraine war.
without the tech transfer, China buying U.S. debt is useless, like a monkey holding a chest full of gold, just papers.
Even if it's 90% clean and just 10% US, that still means they're potentially using equipment in a way that's not covered by the license they used to buy it. They might have enough stockpiled that further sanctions don't matter because domestic suppliers can take over by the time they need replacements. I'm just wondering if people like Jordan Schneider have a point with their argument that plenty of export licences were granted to SMIC, which allowed to keep importing from Lam, KLA and applied materials? Are there any public numbers on how much SMIC imported under such licenses?What if this breakthrough is mostly local and not US?
What if this is a local breakthrough? The U.S. is bitter because they couldn't investigate the source of that supply chainHuawei and SMIC did something incredible, but the accusations from the US aren't untrue, are they? How clean from american products do you believe the supply chain for the kirin 9000S is? Maybe the majority of tools are domestic, Japanese and ASML, but it seems hard to believe that there isn't a single American piece of equipment in the supply chain.
If that's the case, then they have broken american law, for which I applaud them, as american law doesn't apply in China and imposing foreign sanctions is probably illegal under Chinese law. Nevertheless, the senators aren't wrong that Huawei and SMIC haven't obeyed american sanctions and it's therefore justified to cut them off completely from any american tools
That is the kicker I don't think these humanities graduates stooges are seeing the full picture, is probably that BIS haven't granted exports to blacklisted SMIC since the October "Surprise" or even before and even less to Huawei but the worst part is maintenance and services, especially services, that without some tools and processes may not work properly, was the YMTC CEO was who said "That fair thing is to US companies to buyback the tools" and Gina said " they have the ability to shutdown China semi industry". SMIC had found workarounds to the restrictions and that has huge implications for the entire semiconductor industry and if they are using mostly domestic tools? is over.I'm just wondering if people like Jordan Schneider have a point with their argument that plenty of export licences were granted to SMIC, which allowed to keep importing from Lam, KLA and applied materials? Are there any public numbers on how much SMIC imported under such licenses?
That is the kicker I don't think these humanities graduates stooges are seeing the full picture, is probably that BIS haven't granted exports to blacklisted SMIC since the October "Surprise" or even before and even less to Huawei but the worst part is maintenance and services, especially services, that without some tools and processes may not work properly, was the YMTC CEO was who said "That fair thing is to US companies to buyback the tools" and Gina said " they have the ability to shutdown China semi industry". SMIC had found workarounds to the restrictions and that has huge implications for the entire semiconductor industry and if they are using mostly domestic tools? is over.
My name is Huawei and I've worked for every RMB I've got. I've got a tech firm over at Shenzhen, and I've worked 168 hour weeks for 36 years to turn it into something. Now a couple of years ago the U.S. government comes up, and out of the blue says that they want a blanket tech restriction. Says I'm spying for the SeeSeePee. So, it's goodbye Huawei, over and out. You know what they got?
They got NOTHING! Nah-thing! Thank you SMIC. SMIC! SMIC!!!
SMIC: Woah. Tech sanctions can be slippery, let me handle that for you.
that link is talking about licenses pre-October surprise.Even if it's 90% clean and just 10% US, that still means they're potentially using equipment in a way that's not covered by the license they used to buy it. They might have enough stockpiled that further sanctions don't matter because domestic suppliers can take over by the time they need replacements. I'm just wondering if people like Jordan Schneider have a point with their argument that plenty of export licences were granted to SMIC, which allowed to keep importing from Lam, KLA and applied materials? Are there any public numbers on how much SMIC imported under such licenses?
Old article, but claims that SMIC and Huawei bought extensively from the US under export license. Of course we don't know if they use imported equipment only for legacy nodes and domestic equipment for N+2, but that seems very unlikely