Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
Huawei and SMIC did something incredible, but the accusations from the US aren't untrue, are they? How clean from american products do you believe the supply chain for the kirin 9000S is? Maybe the majority of tools are domestic, Japanese and ASML, but it seems hard to believe that there isn't a single American piece of equipment in the supply chain.

If that's the case, then they have broken american law, for which I applaud them, as american law doesn't apply in China and imposing foreign sanctions is probably illegal under Chinese law. Nevertheless, the senators aren't wrong that Huawei and SMIC haven't obeyed american sanctions and it's therefore justified to cut them off completely from any american tools
What if this breakthrough is mostly local and not US?
 

rui009

Banned Idiot
Registered Member
You are mixing two different fires. The one Pendemic is taking about is from 2022.

The one that prevented SMIC EUV machine happened in 2018. SMIC ordered the EUV in 2018. US started pressuring the Dutch as soon as SMIC gave the order. But ASML was on track to deliver the machine to SMIC in early 2019. Then the fire happened in December 2018 and ASML announced that all EUV machines for 2019 delivery has been delayed due to the incident. Then few months into 2019 the US was successful in forcing the Dutch to implement the ban.
Actually, I believe it was rumored they were about to ship the first EUV over. Your link somewhat suggests this may have been true:

"As to EUV, the fire affected part of the production area of the wafer clamp, a module in our EUV systems. We are still in the process of completing the recovery plan for this production area and determining how to minimize any potential impact for our EUV customers, both in our output plan and in our field service."
sabotage to prevent tech transfer to China, playing dirty just like bombing the North Steam pipeline to suck EU into the Ukraine war.

without the tech transfer, China buying U.S. debt is useless, like a monkey holding a chest full of gold, just papers.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
sabotage to prevent tech transfer to China, playing dirty just like bombing the North Steam pipeline to suck EU into the Ukraine war.

without the tech transfer, China buying U.S. debt is useless, like a monkey holding a chest full of gold, just papers.

As stated earlier, members (especially newly hatched ones) should have respect for moderator decisions on this forum. Repeated efforts of ignoring moderator warnings while also taking threads off track will result in banning. There is no need to respond to any more of banned member postings.

We moderate this thread to keep it informative and enjoyable for everyone. I do apologize if I delete your posts sometimes. It maybe harsh in some cases, but we are doing it to keep conversations on track and informative. We are mostly trying to learn here from each other.
 

Minm

Junior Member
Registered Member
What if this breakthrough is mostly local and not US?
Even if it's 90% clean and just 10% US, that still means they're potentially using equipment in a way that's not covered by the license they used to buy it. They might have enough stockpiled that further sanctions don't matter because domestic suppliers can take over by the time they need replacements. I'm just wondering if people like Jordan Schneider have a point with their argument that plenty of export licences were granted to SMIC, which allowed to keep importing from Lam, KLA and applied materials? Are there any public numbers on how much SMIC imported under such licenses?

Old article, but claims that SMIC and Huawei bought extensively from the US under export license. Of course we don't know if they use imported equipment only for legacy nodes and domestic equipment for N+2, but that seems very unlikely
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
Huawei and SMIC did something incredible, but the accusations from the US aren't untrue, are they? How clean from american products do you believe the supply chain for the kirin 9000S is? Maybe the majority of tools are domestic, Japanese and ASML, but it seems hard to believe that there isn't a single American piece of equipment in the supply chain.

If that's the case, then they have broken american law, for which I applaud them, as american law doesn't apply in China and imposing foreign sanctions is probably illegal under Chinese law. Nevertheless, the senators aren't wrong that Huawei and SMIC haven't obeyed american sanctions and it's therefore justified to cut them off completely from any american tools
What if this is a local breakthrough? The U.S. is bitter because they couldn't investigate the source of that supply chain
 

tokenanalyst

Brigadier
Registered Member
I'm just wondering if people like Jordan Schneider have a point with their argument that plenty of export licences were granted to SMIC, which allowed to keep importing from Lam, KLA and applied materials? Are there any public numbers on how much SMIC imported under such licenses?
That is the kicker I don't think these humanities graduates stooges are seeing the full picture, is probably that BIS haven't granted exports to blacklisted SMIC since the October "Surprise" or even before and even less to Huawei but the worst part is maintenance and services, especially services, that without some tools and processes may not work properly, was the YMTC CEO was who said "That fair thing is to US companies to buyback the tools" and Gina said " they have the ability to shutdown China semi industry". SMIC had found workarounds to the restrictions and that has huge implications for the entire semiconductor industry and if they are using mostly domestic tools? is over.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
That is the kicker I don't think these humanities graduates stooges are seeing the full picture, is probably that BIS haven't granted exports to blacklisted SMIC since the October "Surprise" or even before and even less to Huawei but the worst part is maintenance and services, especially services, that without some tools and processes may not work properly, was the YMTC CEO was who said "That fair thing is to US companies to buyback the tools" and Gina said " they have the ability to shutdown China semi industry". SMIC had found workarounds to the restrictions and that has huge implications for the entire semiconductor industry and if they are using mostly domestic tools? is over.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Oh boy I can’t wait to do the Carl thing for YMTC. Please make it happen before CNY.

My name is Huawei and I've worked for every RMB I've got. I've got a tech firm over at Shenzhen, and I've worked 168 hour weeks for 36 years to turn it into something. Now a couple of years ago the U.S. government comes up, and out of the blue says that they want a blanket tech restriction. Says I'm spying for the SeeSeePee. So, it's goodbye Huawei, over and out. You know what they got?

They got NOTHING! Nah-thing! Thank you SMIC. SMIC! SMIC!!!

SMIC: Woah. Tech sanctions can be slippery, let me handle that for you.

That said, I wonder what the Raimondo advertisement posters would look like for YMTC. Their product is a bit hard to present properly. Can’t have Madame trade secretary holding a memory stick can we?
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
Even if it's 90% clean and just 10% US, that still means they're potentially using equipment in a way that's not covered by the license they used to buy it. They might have enough stockpiled that further sanctions don't matter because domestic suppliers can take over by the time they need replacements. I'm just wondering if people like Jordan Schneider have a point with their argument that plenty of export licences were granted to SMIC, which allowed to keep importing from Lam, KLA and applied materials? Are there any public numbers on how much SMIC imported under such licenses?

Old article, but claims that SMIC and Huawei bought extensively from the US under export license. Of course we don't know if they use imported equipment only for legacy nodes and domestic equipment for N+2, but that seems very unlikely
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that link is talking about licenses pre-October surprise.

I think if you read back a few months ago, you'd see that the personnels have even been pulled from fabs that were in question. hvpc also stated several times that SMIC got tools for fixed quantity of wafer production.

There is no evidence SMIC has gotten more since then.

It's only people that can't accept the reality of SMIC being able to find a way of working around October sanctions that are making these arguments.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top