3 things:Thanks for this article. I found the below table quite interesting
View attachment 105714
I tried (with some difficulty) to recover the English names of the companies involved:
Photoresist stripping and ashing (91%) LAM 9%, 浙江宇谦 16%, Mattson 25%, Jet Plasma 44%
Cleaning (66%) NAURA 3%, CETC 4%, Kingsemi 5%, LAM 6%, PNCS 8%, TEL 11%, ACM Research 13%, SCREEN 17%, Tronway 25%
Etching (56%) Jiaxin Semiconductor 5%, TEL 10%, NAURA 19%, AMEC 22%, LAM 29%
CMP (41%) Semicore 11%, BBS KINMEI 16%, Hwatsing 27%, AMAT 30%
CVD (36%) NAURA 9%, Piotech 12%, LAM 23%, AMAT 31%
Metrology (27%) AMAT 3%, SMEE 3%, Hitachi 5%, PMISH 8%, Skyverse 8%, KLA 23%
Thermal processing (26%) Jiaxin Semiconductor 2%, AMAT 3%, Mattson 3%, NAURA 17%, TEL 59%
Coating and developing (24%) Kingsemi 23%, TEL 69%
Ion implantation (7%) CETC 2%, Luyuer Technology 3%, Sumitomo 17%, AMAT 31%, Axcelis 42%
Lithography (0%) Nikon 8%, Canon 21%, ASML 50%
Some notes:
1. I was not able to understand what this 浙江宇谦 company is.
2. The market leader of cleaning seems to be this quite unknown (常州创微微电子) company with 25% share. I'm not sure how to read this.
3. The market leader of photoresist dry stripping (ashing) is this (稷以科技) company. Another never-heard-before name.
3. In metrology KLA has only 23%. I expected much more.
1. I am having trouble understanding what this table means. What is the 91% mean, maybe 91% YoY change or maybe percentage of Chinese companies?, and what do the individual shares mean?
2. In my analysis of the photoresist stripping business in China, Mattson Technology is the top company. Their Chinese name is Yitang. Mattson is an old US company acquired by Beijing's E-Town Capital in 2016
3. On the other part of the original article this table came from, there is a table from Wind. My article in Seeking Alpha adds to that perspective. Its called
"No Evidence U.S. Sanctions Against China Are Working, Thanks To ASML"
can read it here:I look forward to clarification on item 1.