I wonder maybe CETC are more advanced than smee
Have Chinese manufacturer submitted samples for certification? There is a standard for semiconductor grade polymer components: SEMI F57. Anything that passes is semiconductor grade.袁琛浩:请教一下,目前湿法设备的一些塑料管路国内能不能做
havok:可以做,启尔就有做,但材料还是进口的,国产材料还需努力
袁琛浩:Please let me know if some plastic pipes for wet equipment can be made in China
havok:It can be done, and CheerTech does that, but the materials are still imported, and domestic materials still need to work hard
ultra-pure PFA and PTFE are being produced by DuPont Dakin 3M. All ultra-pure PFA and PTFE materials on Chinese market rely on imports, even though Chinese fine chemical industry has been in good development,these super polymer material still cannot produced domestically at the moment.
View attachment 105530
I wonder maybe CETC are more advanced than smee
I wonder what is so sensitive about the tweet you post.That I don't know but this news came out a few days ago and I keep forgetting to report it
CCCC partnered up with Phytium & Galaxy Kylin to develop a ship Beidou position monitoring system. So looks like Phytium has done quite well with the transportation industry.
Starting for 2021, CEC & CCCC worked together for this project and involving Phytium. This system went online in June of 2022.
Again, I think Phytium & Hygon have gotten many orders because they have been the only desktop CPU makers that had competitive products from last year. It takes time for different ministries to certify new CPUs. This is where Loongson really suffered in not having a competitive CPU like 3A5000 or full software support for LoongArch until this year. But now that Loongson is in a better place and coming out with 3A6000 soon, Phytium still hasn't come out with a competitive product to that. Hygon's 3rd generation has come out but is limited by its license from getting to Zen 3 or 4 level. Sure, Phytium can add to instruction set (don't know if Hygon can), but it will need to get software developers to accept those additional instructions. There is a lot of limitation to that.
(Bolded by me)Hygon's 3rd generation has come out but is limited by its license from getting to Zen 3 or 4 level. Sure, Phytium can add to instruction set (don't know if Hygon can), but it will need to get software developers to accept those additional instructions. There is a lot of limitation to that.
I think it's just that twitter user got certain "status" with twitter. There is nothing sensitive about the tweet.I wonder what is so sensitive about the tweet you post.
This is what I get.
View attachment 105569
View attachment 105570
I posted about them here Chinese semiconductor industry and Chinese semiconductor industry. They claim to have completed 3rd generation CPU development and have full IP. I don't know what kind of restrictions they have though.(Bolded by me)
1st bold) I believe Hygon is still with it's first generation cpus - their website advertises the 7000, 5000 and 3000 (all based on Zen 1 cores), are you sure you're not thinking of Zhaoxin which actually has had multiple generations of architecture, and has shown improvement, (albeit slower than I'd have liked). Looking at the article in Aug 2022 discussing it's listing in the STAR market (), they appear to be still using the 7000, 5000 and 3000 designs for their cpus.
2nd bold) Also, I don't believe Hygon can legally make changes to the AMD contribution - afaik the zen 1 core (or core complex, not 100% sure) is a separate block IP that can't be altered. Given that AMD can no longer cooperate with the process it means no more core blocks are available. Any modifications without AMD's blessing would be legally impossible (since it'd be altering a component that has no), and prohibitively expensive/risky (as they wouln't have the 'source' files for the
Legally speaking, I'm not sure that any new CPU designs (with an unchanged Zen 1 block) could be made anyway (afaik the design needs to be approved by AMD in the joint venture). If they can self-approve new cpu designs (without changing the core) they might be able to make a SOC with the Zen 1 block and a non-X86 block, though the only thing they could do to maybe stand out against the non-X86 competition (if they want to retain use of the X86 block) would be to make an SOC that contains the Zen 1 block along with non-X86 processing blocks (either RISC-V core, or more logically a gpu block).
Honestly, if they wanted to stay in the X86 sphere they'd be better off investing in Zhaoxin (though that'd be a couple of years to get something significant enough to be worth replacing the 7000 series). That's why I've warmed up to Longsoon (and a bit sad that Zhaoxin hasn't advanced as much as I would have liked).
In light of what we know about their AMD licensing, I'm confused on what exactly they can do with their current license. I just assume that they are restricted from utilizing AMD Zen 2/3/4 technology. But in terms of what they can modify to create 3rd or 4th generation Hygon CPUs, I have no idea.答:您好,感谢您对公司的关注。公司已经完成对授权技术的消化、吸收,具备了独立完成后续技术迭代和产品升级的能力
What kind of volume production is CETC looking at though? From what I understand, CETC operates the full stack but as an IDM and makes its own chips, equipment but is it comparable to foundry volumes? I wonder if that expertise is transferrable/scalable or if it is a specialty process unique to CETC that allows them to satisfy their needs but may not be HVM ready currently.I wonder maybe CETC are more advanced than smee