broadsword
Brigadier
Japan has "internal discussions" about what sanctions they should impose on China
To all, please, do not ever hope for cooperation from them. Don't cope by saying it's just a few of us, and hoping only.
Japan has "internal discussions" about what sanctions they should impose on China
I think it is actually quiet a pragmatic outcome given that both SMIC and YMTC were between the proverbial rock and a hard place. For SMIC, not pushing the leading edge would mean falling even further behind, so even if the push involves Western tools and may only result in small-scale production the knowledge base acquired would still pay dividends for future development and also localization as they have comparators to benchmark against. To go full-out localization would basically paralyze the operations since they would have to devote the bulk their resources to redesigning and re-validating (the hardest part) all the tools and steps. That they have kept their existing operations running at full capacity, pushed the leading edge in small increments and introduced localized production in parallel is impressive.Take it with a truck load of salt but in summary for things I had been reading looks like before SMIC was put in the blacklist in 2020, there was a civil war in the company between the Taiwanese leadership and Chinese leadership about the course of the company, the Taiwanese side probably argued that SMIC should be pushing for the bleeding edge and should do it fast, that the company should focus in acquiring tools from the West no matter what , the Chinese side argued that was an impossible goal and the US will never let the company to achieve the leading edge, that the best course of action was to secure the company supply chain and introduce local tools in to the supply chain. Looks like the Chinese side won. Looks like they foresaw that this was coming.
SMIC started to validation process of more local tools into their supply chain that include ion implantation equipment, parts and other equipment. One of the founders of SMIC created a equipment company who is developing process equipment so is very probably SMIC is a target client. The most interesting part of all is SMEE, I think they don't only started the testing of SMEE scanners to much of the engineers complains but also I think they took over the development of those scanners along with the Shanghai ICRD, The Semiconductor Equipment Development Innovation Center, Huawei who invested in RSLaser and Beijing ETown. Putting SMEE scanners along side ASML scanners could solve the bottleneck problem
The case of YMTC is quite interesting, they were probably advised that this was going to happen, the tension was in the air. They started to adopt more local tools in their supply chain but the drama about their personal leads to believe that they didn't hire enough non-Americans at time in case the situation worsen and to made things worst the got reliant on KLA tools to advance their NAND products as evidence in the research literature. The reason is probably the high competition in the NAND market.
Many of top Biden administration's people are from thinking group and lobby types but has very little business experience. The lack of industry knowledge shows in many of their policies implementation. Also they don't seem to care about the damage to US chip industries or any other industries because they probably never work in the real world in their life. Many other countries like Taiwan or South Korea are a lot more pro business because Samsung and TMSC has a lot of persuasions in their politics systems. I think that's major difference.The US was recently reported to be lobbying European allies to use "Russian style" sanctions against China. Given this fact, it's more likely that what happened here was that the US went ahead with severe, restrictive sanctions, then realized its allies were not going to get onboard (or that getting them onboard would require more than just the US announcing it), and so backtracked to minimize damage to its own companies and industries since it'd mean handing the Europeans, Japanese, etc. a free market advantage in China, and the US never does anything that isn't to its own advantage.
This doesn't mean the intention has changed, just that the US will go back to the drawing board on negotiating with allies and putting together a "coalition of the willing" rather than go at it alone. That matches up well with Biden's standard of operation so it's the most likely scenario.
Well he is there because the bottomless money pit of the Department of "Defense" want him there and nothing more. They have been battling multiple US administrations who have be trying to balance US commercial competitiveness and "national security" since decades, but now with years of social science think tank rhetoric, hawkish almost fascist politicians and the generous donations of of arms contractors, they got the guy they wanted. A guy who cares about "national security" and not very much about the national competitiveness.Many of top Biden administration's people are from thinking group and lobby types but has very little business experience. The lack of industry knowledge shows in many of their policies implementation. Also they don't seem to care about the damage to US chip industries or any other industries because they probably never work in the real world in their life. Many other countries like Taiwan or South Korea are a lot more pro business because Samsung and TMSC has a lot of persuasions in their politics systems. I think that's major difference.
Bro more on Huawei this time from AsiaTimes.Yeah brother ansy1968, Huawei is just a propaganda story for the Americans at this point.
Huawei continues to build networks, while the US government still goes on and on with the propaganda and sanctions.
Some recent news.