1 hour of time spent less on the train means 1 hour more that can be spent on doing many other things.A 401km project for just one hour reduction of travel time is still a bad project.
1.5 hr is in the same range as the Tri-State area. New York - Jersey is the same transit time. There's plenty of people who go to their 9-5 jobs that way.A reduction of 40% of a 12 hour journey makes sense that is about 5 hours. But a 401km project to reduce the travel time by just only 1 hour doesn't make sense.
The speed of the current line is 220km/hr according to . China wants its people to move faster. What will happen to the current line once the new one starts?
That makes it a 3 hours round trip instead of 5. So that journey can potentially become a day trip vs an overnight trip.A reduction of 40% of a 12 hour journey makes sense that is about 5 hours. But a 401km project to reduce the travel time by just only 1 hour doesn't make sense.
Well they weren’t built there, and at least bombardier had some good track record. CRRC also had issues with boston, with trains having electrical shorts, loose bolts, etc. there was also the class 411s which CRRC refused to fix for Macedonia under warranty when they had electrical problems. It’s embarrassing.