too much self praise my friend, Su-35 has something that still you can not see, it does supercruise, it is not a maybe, it is a fact, PAKFA does supercruise too, but 117 is not the most advanced engine in the world, already type 30 is in the bench test.
Russia passed all the structural technology of Su-27, J-11 is not more than a cloned aircraft built upon Russian technology, you degree of anti-christian Orthodox bias is great did you forget your Russian Rivals under putin have more pro-christian values than your own nation?
Today Su-35 has a radar of 400km. do you understand that to make a radar of such power you need engines generating such voltage? Al-31 will need to generate very large amounts of electricity and have extra batteries plus circuits that lose less energy in heat to reach Su-35`s irbis power.
Do you think i believe J-11 even with AESA can reach 400km? be my guest, it will need lots of batteries and electricity generators and Radar emitters that heat up much much less than even American circuits or french circuits on F-22, F-35 and Rafale, be my guest, but in vilified Russian`s putin the orthodox church plays a role to reduce abortion and with success.
Please forgive my off topic gentlemen, I promise I will make my point and bring it back to SU-35!
B787 you are throwing handfuls of dust in the air Bruda, I love the Flanker, Russian or Chinese, I simply stated for the record, that in my aviation oriented personal opinion, the Chinese Flanker does indeed make use of far more composites materials than does the Russian Flanker. It is also my considered opinion that "structurally" the Chinese Flanker has a much tighter tolerances and better fit and finish.
Furthermore, since the Chinese Flanker is using Russian engines of a very similar nature, without OVT, that it well may have nearly as much thrust as the SU-35, and it will require less maintenance and fusing than the SU-35 with OVT, which operates in a very "hostile environment".
Now, the J-20 uses far more composites, and has a much cleaner composite skin than does the PAK-FA, especially at the forward fuselage/wing intake juncture!
The reason for that is two fold, but very simple,,,,,
1. The Chinese take more time and pride in their workmanship in general!
2. The Chinese build MILLIONS upon Millions of Bicycle Frames, Carbon Fiber Wheel-sets, seat posts and stems for the bicycle industry, very picky, picky people who only want the best.
Those millions of bicycles feature, steel, aluminum, titanium, and carbon fiber in every configuration, with seamless joints and lifetime warranties..... so the Chinese have the expertise to manufacture even high end bicycle equipment for the likes of Pinarello, Colnago, Cannondale, and Trek, just to name a few.....
They also manufacture aftermarket car parts, hoods, deck lids, hood scoops, spoilers etc, etc for equally picky car people.
In other words they get lots and lots of practice building all those things,