Equation
Lieutenant General
All armored vehicles are susceptible to IED explosions. Even the US Abram tanks and Bradley fighting vehicle as well. So I guess they are also cheaply made?
M1-A1 Abram tank
Bradley Fighting vehicle
Chinese military exports to other countries
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
M1-A1 Abram tank
Bradley Fighting vehicle
same ass shot, of a Stryker.
It is a cheap shot at Chinese products, balance ruse my foot.
If this is a strategy to get a seat in moderation team later on, this is not working on me LoL.
WTF does this even mean "not so positive feedback"? So when other vehicles not designed to resist IEDs get blown up, it's also negative feedback? I guess those POS Bradleys and Abrams that got shredded by IEDs had some not so positive feedback, and I'm sure the designers of those worthless garbage cans are scratching their heads wondering where they went wrong. Or not. Here we can see your IQ-deflating bias on full unadulterated display.
Blackstone
Brigadier
Get a hold of yourself son, don't pop a vein in your head. Take your meds and it'll all be okay. I promise...
And yet you utterly failed to respond to the charge of blatant idiocy induced by bias.
Blackstone
Brigadier
Oh what a surprise, you have no clue what you're talking about. I faithfully copied a blogger's comments, without passing judgement on it. You, on the other hand, behaved like the very idiot you accuse others. Again, not a surprise.
Which part of the blogger's comments did you "faithfully" copy this fail commentary from: "Not so positive feedback on Chinese infantry fighting vehicle export"?
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
Take some responsibility for what you say for once. You saw something on the internet, you liked it, you believed it, you even endorsed it with a little commentary, but you're actually really ignorant on military matters so when people rebut the article you chose to post, you have no answer. And when someone calls you out on it, you try to distance yourself from your own post by saying you're just passing on info out there and it had nothing to do with what you thought when you obviously cherry-pick articles that are anti-Chinese military (though not economy) to post. When you post an article without saying anything about it, people assume you're at least 60-70% in agreement with it. When you add snarky commentary, you show people that you are invested in it. Just say thanks when you learn something from other people's rebuttals and next time when you're not sure, try to post it as a question, ie. "Hey, what do you guys think about this?" instead of a snarky derisive comment and you'll have a much easier time later when people bring evidence to tear up your article.
And maybe next time hold back on the engine posts especially since you didn't even know whether single crystal superalloy blades are China's strength or weakness.
Last edited:
broadsword
Brigadier
@man,
You nailed it.
You nailed it.
