broadsword
Brigadier
I wonder if this type of UAV is more efficient (higher endurance)
No. Tandem rotors like those used by Chinooks are more efficient.
I wonder if this type of UAV is more efficient (higher endurance)
Thanks. I’m more interested in comparison with quadcopters like DJI Mavic.No. Tandem rotors like those used by Chinooks are more efficient.
I think these type of designs might be going for compactness, the propeller should be detachable to make the whole system fit in a tube for ease of carrying, I doubt they fly better than conventional quadcopters.Thanks. I’m more interested in comparison with quadcopters like DJI Mavic.
Not fly better, longer endurance with the same battery capacity.I think these type of designs might be going for compactness, the propeller should be detachable to make the whole system fit in a tube for ease of carrying, I doubt they fly better than conventional quadcopters.
This is most likely not the intermeshing rotor I'd speculated, but rather a normal helicopter configuration. Four blades folded in pairs, and at low resolution I mistakenly thought it is a intermeshing rotorIntermeshing-rotor UAV like Kaman K-MAX/CQ-24A? Very compact and foldable rotor design, which means it can be carried on ship. The large fuselage may be used for transport missions like the K-MAX, but closer to Z-20 and more reasonable
View attachment 158240View attachment 158242
The name suggests a maximum takeoff weight of 2,000 kg. Can carry three AG-300A/M missiles or four TY-90 missiles on each sidesThis is most likely not the intermeshing rotor I'd speculated, but rather a normal helicopter configuration. Four blades folded in pairs, and at low resolution I mistakenly thought it is a intermeshing rotor
But it is indeed designed for amphibious assaults. AR-2000 unmanned helicopter, already on display at the Zhuhai Air Show.
View attachment 158513View attachment 158514View attachment 158515