Yeah, that was just a rookie level scenario.Clearly a 54A. Also nice of them to just shoot a single missile rather than spam them.
Here is a tournament level mass swarm scenario. Oh, the poor drones
Yeah, that was just a rookie level scenario.Clearly a 54A. Also nice of them to just shoot a single missile rather than spam them.
Yeah, that was just a rookie level scenario.
Here is a tournament level mass swarm scenario. Oh, the poor drones
Hello,No doubt that laser will be the dominating factor going forward. I think that the proliferation of drones created a nice niche for the weapon. Previously lasers were held back because killing targets such as missiles and planes within a short duration of time required very powerful weapons out of reach for electrically powered lasers. They had to use heavy and expensive chemical lasers instead and those werent very practical. However, smaller drones could be dispatched by relatively low powered lasers, essentially creating an environment for which militaries can incrementally improve laser performance as they field the weapons.
Look impressive. Those laser is on level of Command and Conquer weapon. Just few questions: How Raytheon will supply enough power for those weapon? Especially those on mobile platform. Is US already have Arc Reactor technology?Yeah, that was just a rookie level scenario.
Here is a tournament level mass swarm scenario. Oh, the poor drones
Look impressive. Those laser is on level of Command and Conquer weapon. Just few questions: How Raytheon will supply enough power for those weapon? Especially those on mobile platform. Is US already have Arc Reactor technology?
Hello,
this is an off-topic question. Is there any thread here that is related to rail gun development?
Indeed. I am not sure if everyone realizes this, but weapons of this class are already capable of taking out subsonic cruise missiles. For harder or faster targets, multiple beams can be aimed at the same spot on the target. Rheinmetall demonstrated this capability 8 years ago when they shone five 10kW laser beams at the same target simultaneously.No doubt that laser will be the dominating factor going forward. I think that the proliferation of drones created a nice niche for the weapon. Previously lasers were held back because killing targets such as missiles and planes within a short duration of time required very powerful weapons out of reach for electrically powered lasers. They had to use heavy and expensive chemical lasers instead and those werent very practical. However, smaller drones could be dispatched by relatively low powered lasers, essentially creating an environment for which militaries can incrementally improve laser performance as they field the weapons.
They are already efficient enough for mounting on vehicles and ships.The problem with lasers is that until the lasers become more efficient or the power units become more compact they aren't all that useful.
I have heard of recent advancements in microwave power beaming which might be more interesting than lasers to be honest.