Speculative at the moment, but given Russian Kurganets has 8 Bulat thermobarics missile + 4 kornet, I say it is possible. If you fit 4 Hj12 I don't see the whole launcher to be wider than 600mm too.I
Is that missile rack legit?
Speculative at the moment, but given Russian Kurganets has 8 Bulat thermobarics missile + 4 kornet, I say it is possible. If you fit 4 Hj12 I don't see the whole launcher to be wider than 600mm too.I
Is that missile rack legit?
Shilao and Ahyi talked about the new 8x8 IFV in this video, starting at 58:00.
- unmanned turret,
- main weapon is a 30mm chain cannon (rumor has it that it is based on the Russian 2A42),
Maybe the low front was to give better center of gravity ? Some wheeled IFV got problem with roll over like the Stryker and LAV III.Does anyone know why there is a significant step between the front hull and the rear hull? If the goal is to increase rear hull volume, wouldn't a smoother transition like in many other examples (i.e. Patria AMV, Piranha V, etc) be considered better?
Is it such a big difference though? I think putting a turret will affect the CoG way more than step vs smooth transition. OTOH, step vs smooth transition might affect the armor effectiveness quite a bit more.Maybe the low front was to give better center of gravity ? Some wheeled IFV got problem with roll over like the Stryker and LAV III.
If you concentrate the armor of that 1 foot smooth gradient on a lower front, you gain better center of gravity and better protection.is it such a big difference though? I think putting a turret will affect the CoG way more than step vs smooth transition. OTOH, step vs smooth transition might affect the armor effectiveness quite a bit more
Probably unnecessary? Or too expensive.I wonder why they didn't go with 40mm cannon like this one instead of 2A42 that it designed in 1970s.