SamuraiBlue
Captain
Yet, during the US HTV-2 hypersonic tests, the skin ripped off at speed, and both crashed. I'm sure they did computer simulations too.
You can't simulate badly installed panels.
Yet, during the US HTV-2 hypersonic tests, the skin ripped off at speed, and both crashed. I'm sure they did computer simulations too.
You can't simulate badly installed panels.
Either way, you have to conduct real physical tests for a reason.You can't simulate badly installed panels.
Setting the record straight, the US has conducted at least 7 live hyper sonic flights in the forms of X43,X51 and HVT 2.
The two HVT2 hyper sonic glider tests were both terminated by the flight computers and both vehicles landed in the pacific.
X51 suffered the closest to panel failure once when one of its flight control surfaces failed to deploy, it also on another case failed to transition to JP7 from ethylene, failed to properly operate its air intake.... The final test in 2013 however successfully completed the set test.
Well on that Shen I get another correction. NASA has a Hypersonic wind tunnel.
The Nasa Langley research center 8 -Foot High Temperature Tunnel
The Langley 8-Foot High Temperature Tunnel (8-Ft HTT) is a combustion-heated hypersonic blowdown-to-atmosphere wind tunnel that provides simulation of flight enthalpy (relationship of an object, its environment, and energy) for Mach numbers of 4, 5, and 7 and Reynolds numbers from 0.3 x 106 to 5.09 x 106 per foot, depending on the Mach number. The test section will accommodate air-breathing hypersonic propulsion systems and structural and thermal protection system components. A radiant heater system can be used to simulate ascent or re-entry heating profiles.
If China's scramjet engine advancement is anything like its glorious turbofan development, then we might see some good results on Mao's 150th Birthday.
Since Blackstone's posts rarely get moderated like mine, I'd like us to all learn how to construct fact-based comments without resorting to "racism or ideologies". Here are some examples from Dr Admiral Viceroy Commander Blackstone
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinese-hypersonic-projects-research.t7872/page-15#post-367033
If China's scramjet engine advancement is anything like its glorious turbofan development, then we might see some good results on Mao's 150th Birthday.
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinese-hypersonic-projects-research.t7872/page-15#post-367034
Talk is cheap, just like there were so much early talk about WS-10 "successes." When it comes to Chinese engine technology advancements, it's *buyers beware*.
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinese-hypersonic-projects-research.t7872/page-15#post-367036
True, but the same SOEs. I mean what would you expect to see first, WS-15s on J-20s, or the Second Coming? *I vote the latter.*
https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/chinese-hypersonic-projects-research.t7872/page-15#post-367039
While what happened in the past doesn't mean the same things will happen in the future, but demonstrated incompetence tends to color future prospects, until properly dispelled. Wouldn't you agree?
So please guys, don't make the same mistakes as me by quoting from the news agencies, acclaimed military aircraft designers, the World Health Organization, and especially not manufacturer's themselves.
That's biased and ideological.
yes, I agree. it would be more correct to say China has the largest hypersonic wind tunnel.
and the fact that wind tunnels are still needed supports the point that physical tests are still necessary.