China's geopolitical thinking is all about non-interference.
True, but western media is always in interference of China's geopolitical non-interference by criticizing and downplaying it.
With the global "info explosions" in the social media, not easy to hide or lie - unless to a gullible audience, and there are some of them.
The problem is not there are some of them....they are the majority!! Of course anyone would want free press, who wouldn't? But is everyone responsible, educated and sensible enough to form the correct opinion on a published report? Even so, one can also make the wrong opinion base on fallacies that never even crossed his mind. Sometimes we don't even know we have been brainwashed and indoctrinated by society and the mass media.
Sometimes, different cultures think very differently about things. Westerners admire and value diamonds for it's perfections, while East Asians admire and value jade for its imperfections. Classical Western paintings are adored for their details and complexity, while classical Oriental paintings are adored for their abstractness and simplicity. Long term in the Western business context is short term to East Asians.
If you're trying to compare China with USA, or to a lesser extent, Russia, then don't bother. China's greatest concern today, and in the next few decades, is and will remain its domestic issues. Overpopulation, rapid social changes, pollution, food safety, social accountability, health care... these are all monumental challenges that dwarf any concern of power projections.
Where China needs to project power are issues that touch upon its core interests: Taiwan independence, Xinjiang terrorism, South China Sea islands, Diaoyu Islands. On those issues, China's actions and plans are clear to see: expanded cooperation with the central asian -stans, modernization of the PLAN to defend its claims in SCS and Diaoyu, continued strengthening of A2/AD capabilities to counter US containment strategies, which at the same stroke, dissuades Taiwan independence.
I think it is a bit of a waste to not to put more attention on foreign policy at this period of time to be honest, under Obama administration Russia restored crimea back to her territory, and by the looks of things probably the rest of eastern Ukraine as well.
I wonder what can China get back if she can be a bit more aggressive on her territorial disputes, well she better hurry up its only 3 years left until the next election.
And on top of that China doesn't have 8500 nuclear warheads to back up any of her actions like the Russians.
While in a sense I do agree with what you are saying; I don't agree with the idea that you speak and definitely not the examples that you chose.
To make a claim that someone's opinion or perspective is irresponsible, under-educated and sensible -> and is affected by a certain brainwashing and indoctrination - is to claim that you know what they have been through and is able to for such a judgement. Which in reality is impossible to do; and hence is also in agreement to the idea that your statement is also under-educated and since you also have not considered all possibilities: irresponsible.
I am not against you, but only trying to point out the fallacy of saying other people are brainwashed or indoctrinated.
Which is also to say, culturally, Chinese people think in absolutes, good-evil, right-wrong, honorable-dishonorable etc. Not all westerner admire diamonds, not all Chinese prefer jade. Some oriental paintings do have detail and complexity - often finely crafted with gilded paints and all, and some western paintings are abstract - Van Gogh? Business models, the VOC, BIC and other european trade companies lasted 400 some years, the US model by Vanderbilt, Rockerfella had been around for 100s years; we can say that the Chinese toxic manufacturing model right now will end relatively shortly - either the people die of the toxins or if the government tightens laws.
What I am saying is, those absolute statements are not true. again, no insult intended.