Chinese Engine Development

ThatNiceType055

Junior Member
Registered Member
I see. Compared to the WS-15, how far along is XF9?
Actually they are really not compareable. The XF9 is an research project without any particular fighter project, while the WS-15 is the target engine of J-20. The XF9 project at best would be a technology demonstrator, not an usable engine. There is still gap between a successful research project and an actual engine ready for service. On the other hand, the research stage of the WS-15 have been completed years ago, it might have already been tested on a J-20.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I agree. Compared to industry leaders WS-10 is not an impressive engine. In fact it's about the same level as CFM56-5 which is very much legacy tech for the west. But it does facilitate the emergence of future, more competitive engines by giving China a solid foundation to work from, and that is its true significance. With the WS-10 out of the way, successive turbofans will have a more straightforward testing and certification process that doesn't involve incessant trial and error, paving the way for China to eventually match and surpass western engines.

So I don't want it to sound like WS-10C is not an impressive. What China has done in short term is extraordinary. They managed to increase thrust by 16% from 2009 to 2019, while also significant improving reliability and service life. They are able to produce enough WS-10 to power up to 100 J-20s/flankers a year + another 20 to 40 J-10s. That's really difficult to be able to mass produce WS-10 to this degree. The industrial gains here to be able to do this is invaluable.

I remember when they first started to fly, the failure rate on WS-10 was out of this world. They had so many little issues they had to work through. You do expect your first real modern engine to have this level of problems, but it was definitely a painful process. Over time, they worked through the problems until they finally got an engine with higher thrust, lower fuel consumption and more reliability than the Russian engines they were replacing. Quite amazing stuff. Huge progress in these 10 years. While I expected WS-15 to be ready sooner (like around 2023) when J-20 first came out, I think it's actually more important that they are able to mass produce WS-10 at such a high level and reliability. When WS-15 is ready to be mass produced, I don't think we will have the same long maturation process we had with WS-10.

I also think WS-15 will probably come out with more power than I originally expected. I was thinking in the 150 kN to 160 kN back 10 years ago. I think it will likely to be closer 170 kN by the time it comes out.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
I'm not really understanding this continued arguments about why F-135 performance isn't impressive. They are able to increasing the temperature because PW has access to very advanced and mature materials science from all its other projects. Sure China can do the same on WS-10 or WS-15 to increase their performance, but it takes time to develop these new material and put them into production. We see WS-10C now with much better performance and reliability than the original WS-10. Sure, they made some changes and fixed some design issues. But a larger part of that is using improved material that can handle higher heat. I mean most people here wants China to be closer to world leaders in engine development, but we have to be realistic about where they are. Engine industry has very high entrance barriers. What they've done with WS-10C, WS-21, WZ-9G, WZ-10 and WS-20 are all pretty significant already. The 3 leading US/British companies are just very far ahead here. Also, I don't buy this argument of ranking by military engine and then civilian engine. If RR actually had a project to develop 6th generation engine, they will have no problem doing it at about the same timeline as PW or GE.
In China the materials are already developed. They’ve gone ahead with the component technology well in advance of the WS-15’s development cycle. That’s how they can already start work on their next generation engine. And in fact we’ve already seen some hints that they’ve started work on an iterative improvement to the WS-15.
 

latenlazy

Brigadier
That's because UK is right up there with US in turbofan technology. The main difference between them is funding more than anything else.

Some member/s contributed some insightful material months back. China is at gen 3 and 4 materials (for 5th gen and beyond engines) while UK and US are at gen 4 and 5 material. Japan developed some impressive new breakthroughs for gen 5 or 6 recently? Anyway on materials, China is definitely behind the top two players - US and UK. On the specific field of materials, even Japan is right up there if not at the bleeding edge, perhaps not overall in materials but certainly in some respects.
I think based on the last five or so years of probing the academic publication space the lead time between when research on new materials gets published and when it’s actually developed is maybe 2-3 years. We’re starting to see some stuff on 5th gen single crystals in Chinese academic literature so my guess is they already have 5th gen single crystal materials in testing.
 
Last edited:
Top