Which one are you referring to, WS-15 or XF9?Apparently there are some problems inherent with the design. I read an article from a Beihang student that compared the configuration with that of F-119.
Which one are you referring to, WS-15 or XF9?Apparently there are some problems inherent with the design. I read an article from a Beihang student that compared the configuration with that of F-119.
Can you show that please.Apparently there are some problems inherent with the design. I read an article from a Beihang student that compared the configuration with that of F-119.
Which one are you referring to, WS-15 or XF9?
Actually they are really not compareable. The XF9 is an research project without any particular fighter project, while the WS-15 is the target engine of J-20. The XF9 project at best would be a technology demonstrator, not an usable engine. There is still gap between a successful research project and an actual engine ready for service. On the other hand, the research stage of the WS-15 have been completed years ago, it might have already been tested on a J-20.I see. Compared to the WS-15, how far along is XF9?
Can you show that please.
Damn that is one hell of a detailed article. You only see such details on hacker news. I am impressed.
I agree. Compared to industry leaders WS-10 is not an impressive engine. In fact it's about the same level as CFM56-5 which is very much legacy tech for the west. But it does facilitate the emergence of future, more competitive engines by giving China a solid foundation to work from, and that is its true significance. With the WS-10 out of the way, successive turbofans will have a more straightforward testing and certification process that doesn't involve incessant trial and error, paving the way for China to eventually match and surpass western engines.
In China the materials are already developed. They’ve gone ahead with the component technology well in advance of the WS-15’s development cycle. That’s how they can already start work on their next generation engine. And in fact we’ve already seen some hints that they’ve started work on an iterative improvement to the WS-15.I'm not really understanding this continued arguments about why F-135 performance isn't impressive. They are able to increasing the temperature because PW has access to very advanced and mature materials science from all its other projects. Sure China can do the same on WS-10 or WS-15 to increase their performance, but it takes time to develop these new material and put them into production. We see WS-10C now with much better performance and reliability than the original WS-10. Sure, they made some changes and fixed some design issues. But a larger part of that is using improved material that can handle higher heat. I mean most people here wants China to be closer to world leaders in engine development, but we have to be realistic about where they are. Engine industry has very high entrance barriers. What they've done with WS-10C, WS-21, WZ-9G, WZ-10 and WS-20 are all pretty significant already. The 3 leading US/British companies are just very far ahead here. Also, I don't buy this argument of ranking by military engine and then civilian engine. If RR actually had a project to develop 6th generation engine, they will have no problem doing it at about the same timeline as PW or GE.
I think based on the last five or so years of probing the academic publication space the lead time between when research on new materials gets published and when it’s actually developed is maybe 2-3 years. We’re starting to see some stuff on 5th gen single crystals in Chinese academic literature so my guess is they already have 5th gen single crystal materials in testing.That's because UK is right up there with US in turbofan technology. The main difference between them is funding more than anything else.
Some member/s contributed some insightful material months back. China is at gen 3 and 4 materials (for 5th gen and beyond engines) while UK and US are at gen 4 and 5 material. Japan developed some impressive new breakthroughs for gen 5 or 6 recently? Anyway on materials, China is definitely behind the top two players - US and UK. On the specific field of materials, even Japan is right up there if not at the bleeding edge, perhaps not overall in materials but certainly in some respects.