Chinese Engine Development

broadsword

Brigadier
From wiki:
The AEP500's 5,000 kW (6,700 hp) equivalent power is similar to the Dash 8 Q400's 4,600 kW
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, to propel a 74-100 seats airliner at Mach 0.6 and FL300-330. It has a three-shaft layout for compactness and performance retention, the low-pressure compressor has four
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
stages while the high-pressure compressor has one axial and one
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
stage, both driven by single stages turbines. A demonstrator without the three stage
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
should be run in 2022/2023, a technology demonstrator in 2025, and certification is targeted for 2035 Takeoff
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
should be below 260 g/kW/h (0.43 lb/hp/hr).

Hopefully, the development cycle could be sped up.
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
He says WS-10 is a copy of AL-31.

it's obvious he is a Quack expert. Instant credibility loss.

He does know a lot of stuff and certainly is an engineer who's worked in these fields. The issue with his content on China though is that he's a lazy expert and doesn't bother learning anything about Chinese things, preferring to simplify everything into "it's a copy of something".

The fact that China is behind western military aviation doesn't help China's case since everything is at least based off something else if nothing more than conceptually based off.

On top of this, he's also extremely politically motivated. I mean he talks up the Tejas and really makes some effort to placate Indians. The Tejas, even for 4th gen fighter design, has absolutely no aerodynamic sophistication but he finds a way to talk it up and reduces Chinese designs to "well it's between Soviet and American designs"... like the Tejas isn't a totally French design.
 

gelgoog

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
He seems to have some proper experience with regards to aeronautical engineering like software, avionics, or airframe design.
But engines are the domain of mechanical and materials engineers not aeronautical ones.
I also agree that he is lazy with regards to Chinese airplane analysis. Not that we can blame him much since there is little information on them in the West except for Deino's books.
About Tejas, is probably just because there is a huge amount of Indians on YouTube. He has to pander to the audience a bit. Chinese don't use YouTube nearly as much. It is banned inside China anyway.
 

by78

General
More high-resolution images of the WS-10 mockup from Zhuhai.

51604582956_ea020bcac7_k.jpg
51603757967_86ce609c2b_k.jpg

51604799553_f99e58c8ff_k.jpg

51605241839_9a2931c3ec_k.jpg
51605462830_bbabb802b7_k.jpg
 
Top